Medical relevance of magnetic fields in pain therapy

被引:0
作者
Salomonowitz, G. [1 ]
Friedrich, M. [2 ]
Guentert, B. J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Fachhsch Campus Wien, A-1100 Vienna, Austria
[2] Orthopad Spital Speising, Vienna, Austria
[3] Univ Gesundheitswissensch, Inst Management & Okon Gesundheitswesen UMIT, Hall In Tirol, Germany
来源
SCHMERZ | 2011年 / 25卷 / 02期
关键词
Magnetic field therapy; Magnetic stimulation therapy; Magnetics; Magnetic resonance; Pain; PULSED ELECTROMAGNETIC-FIELDS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL; ONSET MUSCLE SORENESS; LOW-BACK-PAIN; DOUBLE-BLIND; CLINICAL-TRIALS; STATIC MAGNETS; KNEE; OSTEOARTHRITIS;
D O I
10.1007/s00482-010-1005-0
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Magnetic and electromagnetic fields have been accepted as real physical entities in medicine and are believed to achieve pain relief. Magnetic field therapy has been acknowledged as a non-invasive, safe and simple method for treatment of the site of injury, source of pain or inflammation, or other types of illnesses and pathologies. However, a consensus regarding the statistical relevance of the effects has not been established. A detailed literature research was performed and the results were evaluated. Inclusion criteria were that the studies had to be randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled, and no additional forms of treatment other than magnetic effects were allowed to be used. The evaluation of 17 studies with static magnetic fields showed on average no significant difference in pain relief between the group treated with magnetic fields and the placebo group. All studies using magnetic fields showed that forms of treatment conducted over a period of 30 min and at intervals of 1 week have no effects. In 10 studies with dynamic magnetic fields different effects were registered, which ranged from no effect to significant differences regarding pain relief between the treated and the control groups. Static magnetic fields are ineffective with respect to pain therapy. Dynamic magnetic fields show diverse effects. Hence, this therapy should be researched in depth.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / +
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[11]  
*IASP TASK FORC TA, 1994, PAIN TERMS CURR LI 3, pS209
[12]   Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? [J].
Jadad, AR ;
Moore, RA ;
Carroll, D ;
Jenkinson, C ;
Reynolds, DJM ;
Gavaghan, DJ ;
McQuay, HJ .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1996, 17 (01) :1-12
[13]   Influence of static magnetic fields on pain perception and sympathetic nerve activity in humans [J].
Kuipers, Nathan T. ;
Sander, Charity L. ;
Ray, Chester A. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 102 (04) :1410-1415
[14]   The effect of MBST®-NuclearResonanceTherapy with a complex 3-dimensional electromagnetic nuclear resonance field on patients with Low Back Pain [J].
Kullich, W. ;
Schwann, H. ;
Walcher, J. ;
Machreich, K. .
JOURNAL OF BACK AND MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION, 2006, 19 (2-3) :79-87
[15]   POSSIBLE MECHANISM FOR THE INFLUENCE OF WEAK MAGNETIC-FIELDS ON BIOLOGICAL-SYSTEMS [J].
LEDNEV, VV .
BIOELECTROMAGNETICS, 1991, 12 (02) :71-75
[16]   Efficacy of pulsed electromagnetic therapy for chronic lower back pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study [J].
Lee, P. B. ;
Kim, Y. C. ;
Lim, Y. J. ;
Lee, C. J. ;
Choi, S. S. ;
Park, S. H. ;
Lee, J. G. ;
Lee, S. C. .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2006, 34 (02) :160-167
[17]  
LIBOFF AR, 1987, J BIOELECTRICITY, V6, P13
[18]   Expanding use of pulsed electromagnetic field therapies [J].
Markov, Marko S. .
ELECTROMAGNETIC BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2007, 26 (03) :257-274
[19]   Magnetic field therapy: A review [J].
Markov, Marko S. .
ELECTROMAGNETIC BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2007, 26 (01) :1-23
[20]   Effect of static magnetic therapy on recovery from delayed onset muscle soreness [J].
Mikesky, AE ;
Hayden, MW .
PHYSICAL THERAPY IN SPORT, 2005, 6 (04) :188-194