How Does Perceived Support for Innovation Lead to Deviant Innovation Behavior of Knowledge Workers? A Moderated Mediation Framework

被引:3
作者
Yuan, Shujie [1 ]
Liu, Xuan [2 ]
机构
[1] Huangshan Univ, Dept Psychol, Huangshan, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Tech Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Nanjing, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2022年 / 13卷
关键词
perceived support for innovation; deviant innovation; innovation commitment; threatened self-identity; relationship; ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT; CREATIVITY; PERFORMANCE; UNCERTAINTY; COMMITMENT; MODEL;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2022.890999
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Many studies concerning deviant innovation behavior mainly focus on the influence of personality differences or leadership styles, and there is a lack of attention given to internal cognitive factors related to actors. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to examine the internal mechanism of perceived support for innovation on deviant innovation behavior. A two-wave study was conducted among 393 knowledge workers from 10 knowledge-intensive enterprises in the People's Republic of China. Model 4 and Model 14 from SPSS macro PROCESS are used to test the mediating effect of innovation commitment and the moderating effect of threatened self-identity, respectively. The findings suggest that perceived support for innovation can significantly predict deviant innovation behavior; innovation commitment fully mediates the relationship between perceived support for innovation and deviant innovation behavior; public threat to self-identity plays a moderating role in the relationship between innovation commitment and deviant innovation behavior; and public threat to self-identity moderates the mediating effect of innovation commitment on perceived support for innovation and deviant innovation behavior. This study enriches the research on antecedent variables of deviant innovation behavior, and highlights the important role of situational factors on the whole mechanism.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [1] Anwar R, 2017, ADV INTEL SYS RES, V131, P159
  • [2] Augsdorfer P., 1996, Forbidden fruit: An analysis of bootlegging, uncertainty, and learning in corporate R
  • [3] POSSESSIONS AND THE EXTENDED SELF
    BELK, RW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1988, 15 (02) : 139 - 168
  • [4] Organizational identification and workplace behavior: More than meets the eye
    Blader, Steven L.
    Patil, Shefali
    Packer, Dominic J.
    [J]. RESEARCH IN ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR: AN ANNUAL SERIES OF ANALYTICAL ESSAYS AND CRITICAL REVIEWS, VOL 37, 2017, 37 : 19 - 34
  • [5] Transformational leadership and creativity in sport: Examining the mediating role of support for innovation
    Bosselut, Gregoire
    Guilbert, Laure
    Chareyre, Laura
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2020, 38 (23) : 2698 - 2707
  • [6] Brislin RW., 1986, FIELD METHODS CROSS, P137, DOI DOI 10.1177/017084068800900318
  • [7] Uncertainty avoidance and the exploration-exploitation trade-off
    Broekhuizen, Thijs L. J.
    Giarratana, Marco S.
    Torres, Anna
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2017, 51 (11-12) : 2080 - 2100
  • [8] Campbell KeithW., 1999, REV GEN PSYCHOL, V3, P23, DOI [10.1037/1089-2680.3.1.23, DOI 10.1037/1089-2680.3.1.23]
  • [9] The relationship between the three components of commitment and employee performance in China
    Chen, ZX
    Francesco, AM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2003, 62 (03) : 490 - 510
  • [10] Cheng L.P., 2019, 4 EBMEI INT C EC BUS, P57