Prognostic value of SUVmax in breast cancer and comparative analyses of molecular subtypes A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:15
作者
Lee, Moon Il [1 ]
Jung, Youn Joo [2 ]
Kim, Dong Il [2 ]
Lee, Seungju [2 ]
Jung, Chang Shin [2 ]
Kang, Seok Kyung [2 ]
Pak, Kyoungjune [3 ,4 ]
Kim, Seong Jang [5 ]
Kim, Hyun Yul [2 ]
机构
[1] Hwamyoung Ilsin Christian Hosp, Breast Surg, Pusan, South Korea
[2] Pusan Natl Univ, Dept Surg, Yangsan Hosp, Yangsan, South Korea
[3] Pusan Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Busan, South Korea
[4] Pusan Natl Univ Hosp, Biomed Res Inst, Busan, South Korea
[5] Pusan Natl Univ, Dept Nucl Med, Yangsan Hosp, Yangsan, South Korea
关键词
breast cancer; meta-analysis; prognostic value; SUVmax; PREOPERATIVE F-18-FDG PET/CT; SURVIVAL; TOMOGRAPHY; STATISTICS; RECURRENCE; PARAMETERS; THERAPY; RATIO;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000026745
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: To assess the prognostic capability of the maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) measured in the primary tumor and axillary lymph nodes (ALNs) by pretreatment fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography and analyze outcomes according to the molecular breast cancer subtypes. Methods: The databases were systematically searched using keywords for breast cancer, positron emission tomography/computed tomography, and SUVmax; the extracted studies reported at least 1 form of survival data, event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival. Comparative analyses of the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for EFS and overall survival were performed to assess their correlations with SUVmax. The pooled HR was estimated using random-effects model according to the results of heterogeneity. Results: Thirteen eligible studies comprising 3040 patients with breast cancer were included. The pooled HRs of high SUVmax in the primary tumor and ALN were 3.01 (95% CI 1.83-4.97, P < .00001; I2 = 82%) and 3.72 (95% CI 1.15-12.01; I2 = 92%; P = .03), respectively. Patients with higher SUVmax demonstrated a poorer survival prognosis. Furthermore, comparative analyses according to the molecular subtypes demonstrated that the SUVmax in the primary tumor or ALN can be a predictive parameter in patients with the luminal subtype disease. Subtype analysis results indicated a significant association of the luminal group, with a HR of 2.65 (95% CI 1.31-5.37; I2 = 27%; P = .007). Conclusions: SUVmax from pretreatment is a significant prognostic factor for EFS in patients with breast cancer. Despite several limitations, correlation with molecular subtype (luminal type) was demonstrated. Further large-scale studies are required to investigate the precise prognostic capability of SUVmax.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Standardized uptake value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for prediction of tumor recurrence in breast cancer beyond tumor burden [J].
Ahn, Sung Gwe ;
Park, Jong Tae ;
Lee, Hak Min ;
Lee, Hak Woo ;
Jeon, Tae Joo ;
Han, Kyunghwa ;
Lee, Seung Ah ;
Dong, Seung Myung ;
Ryu, Young Hoon ;
Son, Eun Ju ;
Jeong, Joon .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2014, 16 (06)
[2]   Utility of 18F FDG-PET/CT for predicting prognosis of luminal-type breast cancer [J].
Aogi, Kenjiro ;
Kadoya, Takayuki ;
Sugawara, Yoshifumi ;
Kiyoto, Sachiko ;
Shigematsu, Hideo ;
Masumoto, Norio ;
Okada, Morihito .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2015, 150 (01) :209-217
[3]   Percent positive axillary lymph node metastasis predicts survival in patients with non-metastatic breast cancer [J].
Atahan, Ibtisam Lale ;
Yildiz, Ferah ;
Ozyigit, Gokhan ;
Sari, Sait ;
Gurkaynak, Murat ;
Selek, Ugur ;
Hayran, Mutlu .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2008, 47 (02) :232-238
[4]   Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Pretreatment SUV in 18F-FDG/PET in Breast Cancer: Comparison with Apparent Diffusion Coefficient from Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging [J].
Baba, Shingo ;
Isoda, Takuro ;
Maruoka, Yasuhiro ;
Kitamura, Yoshiyuki ;
Sasaki, Masayuki ;
Yoshida, Tsuyoshi ;
Honda, Hiroshi .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2014, 55 (05) :736-742
[5]   Preoperative PET/CT in early-stage breast cancer [J].
Bernsdorf, M. ;
Berthelsen, A. K. ;
Wielenga, V. T. ;
Kroman, N. ;
Teilum, D. ;
Binderup, T. ;
Tange, U. B. ;
Andersson, M. ;
Kjaer, A. ;
Loft, A. ;
Graff, J. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2012, 23 (09) :2277-2282
[6]   PSMA PET and Radionuclide Therapy in Prostate Cancer [J].
Bouchelouche, Kirsten ;
Turkbey, Baris ;
Choyke, Peter L. .
SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2016, 46 (06) :522-535
[7]   FDG uptake in breast cancer:: correlation with biological and clinical prognostic parameters [J].
Buck, A ;
Schirrmeister, H ;
Kühn, T ;
Shen, CX ;
Kalker, T ;
Kotzerke, J ;
Dankerl, A ;
Glatting, G ;
Reske, S ;
Mattfeldt, T .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2002, 29 (10) :1317-1323
[8]  
CARTER CL, 1989, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V63, P181, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19890101)63:1<181::AID-CNCR2820630129>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-H
[10]   Direct comparison of PET/CT and MRI to predict the pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a meta-analysis [J].
Chen, Lihua ;
Yang, Qifang ;
Bao, Jing ;
Liu, Daihong ;
Huang, Xuequan ;
Wang, Jian .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7