When predictions fail: Correction for extrapolation in the flash-grab effect

被引:17
作者
Blom, Tessel [1 ]
Liang, Qianchen [1 ]
Hogendoorn, Hinze [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Psychol Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Utrecht, Helmholtz Inst, Dept Expt Psychol, Utrecht, Netherlands
来源
JOURNAL OF VISION | 2019年 / 19卷 / 02期
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
motion perception; visual cognition; spatial vision; temporal vision; MOVING-OBJECTS; VISUAL-MOTION; POSITION; LAG; ATTENTION; SPACE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; POSTDICTION; PERCEPTION; LATENCIES;
D O I
10.1167/19.2.3
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Motion-induced position shifts constitute a broad class of visual illusions in which motion and position signals interact in the human visual pathway. In such illusions, the presence of visual motion distorts the perceived positions of objects in nearby space. Predictive mechanisms, which could contribute to compensating for processing delays due to neural transmission, have been given as an explanation. However, such mechanisms have struggled to explain why we do not usually perceive objects extrapolated beyond the end of their trajectory. Advocates of this interpretation have proposed a "correction-for-extrapolation" mechanism to explain this: When the object motion ends abruptly, this mechanism corrects the overextrapolation by shifting the perceived object location backwards to its actual location. However, such a mechanism has so far not been empirically demonstrated. Here, we use a novel version of the flash-grab illusion to demonstrate this mechanism. In the flash-grab effect, a target is flashed on a moving background that abruptly changes direction, leading to the mislocalization of the target. Here, we manipulate the angle of the direction change to dissociate the contributions of the background motion before and after the flash. Consistent with previous reports, we observe that perceptual mislocalization in the flash-grab illusion is mainly driven by motion after the flash. Importantly, however, we reveal a small but consistent mislocalization component in the direction opposite to the direction of the first motion sequence. This provides empirical support for the proposed correction-for-extrapolation mechanism, and therefore corroborates the interpretation that motion-induced position shifts might result from predictive interactions between motion and position signals.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 11
页数:11
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], BIORXIV
  • [2] ANSTIS S, 1989, P RET RES F, V2, P247
  • [3] EXTRAPOLATION OR ATTENTION SHIFT
    BALDO, MVC
    KLEIN, SA
    [J]. NATURE, 1995, 378 (6557) : 565 - 566
  • [4] Anticipation of moving stimuli by the retina
    Berry, MJ
    Brivanlou, IH
    Jordan, TA
    Meister, M
    [J]. NATURE, 1999, 398 (6725) : 334 - 338
  • [5] The psychophysics toolbox
    Brainard, DH
    [J]. SPATIAL VISION, 1997, 10 (04): : 433 - 436
  • [6] Motion extrapolation is not responsible for the flash-lag effect
    Brenner, E
    Smeets, JBJ
    [J]. VISION RESEARCH, 2000, 40 (13) : 1645 - 1648
  • [7] Cai RH, 2001, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V42, pS711
  • [8] The flash grab effect
    Cavanagh, Patrick
    Anstis, Stuart
    [J]. VISION RESEARCH, 2013, 91 : 8 - 20
  • [9] Events before the flash Do influence the flash-lag magnitude
    Chappell, M
    Hine, TJ
    [J]. VISION RESEARCH, 2004, 44 (03) : 235 - 239
  • [10] The Neural Circuit Mechanisms Underlying the Retinal Response to Motion Reversal
    Chen, Eric Y.
    Chou, Janice
    Park, Jeongsook
    Schwartz, Greg
    Berry, Michael J., II
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 34 (47) : 15557 - 15575