Magnetic resonance imaging system for intraoperative margin assessment for DCIS and invasive breast cancer using the ClearSight™ system in breast-conserving surgery-Results from a postmarketing study

被引:6
作者
Thill, Marc [1 ]
Szwarcfiter, Iris [2 ]
Kelling, Katharina [1 ]
van Haasteren, Viviane [1 ]
Kolka, Eyal [2 ]
Noelke, Josefa [1 ]
Pees, Zachi [2 ]
Papa, Moshe [3 ,4 ]
Aulmann, Sebastian [5 ]
Allweis, Tanir [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Agaples Markus Krankenhaus, Dept Gynecol & Gynecol Oncol, Wilhelm Epstein Str 4, D-60431 Frankfurt, Germany
[2] Clear Cut Med Ltd, Rehovot, Israel
[3] Assuta Med Ctr, Gen Surg Unit, Tel Aviv, Israel
[4] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Sch Med, Tel Aviv, Israel
[5] OptiPath, Frankfurt, Germany
[6] Breast Hlth Ctr, Kaplan Med Cente, Rehovot, Israel
[7] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Fac Med, Jerusalem, Israel
关键词
diffusion weighted; lumpectomy; re-excision rate; surgical margins; CARCINOMA-IN-SITU; REAL-TIME; CONSERVATIVE SURGERY; POSITIVE MARGINS; RADIATION; DIAGNOSIS; RESECTION; THERAPY; TUMOR; PROBE;
D O I
10.1002/jso.26721
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and objectives Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is followed by reoperations in approximately 25%. Reoperations lead to an increased risk of infection and wound healing problems as well as a worse cosmetic outcome. Several technical approaches for an intraoperative margin assessment to decrease the reoperation rate are under evaluation, some of them are still experimental. Methods A prospective single-arm post-marketing study with 60 patients undergoing BCS for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive breast cancer was conducted. The specimen was intraoperatively examined by the ClearSight (TM) system, a mobile magnetic resonance imaging system that is based on a diffusion-weighted imaging protocol. However, the results were blinded to the surgeon. Results The ClearSight (TM) system was performed for both ductal and lobular breast cancer and DCIS, with a sensitivity of 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44-0.96) and a specificity of 0.84 (95% CI 0.72-0.92), with an overall diagnostic accuracy of 80%. Conclusion Had the ClearSight (TM) been known to the surgeon intraoperatively, the reoperation rate would have been reduced by 83% for invasive carcinoma, from 10% to 2%, and 50% for DCIS, from 30% to 15% reoperations. A trial designed to examine the impact on reoperation rates is currently ongoing.
引用
收藏
页码:361 / 368
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Concept for using magnetic particle imaging for intraoperative margin analysis in breast-conserving surgery
    Mason, Erica E.
    Mattingly, Eli
    Herb, Konstantin
    Sliwiak, Monika
    Franconi, Sofia
    Cooley, Clarissa Zimmerman
    Slanetz, Priscilla J.
    Wald, Lawrence L.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [2] An Intraoperative MRI System for Margin Assessment in Breast Conserving Surgery: Initial Results From a Novel Technique
    Papa, Moshe
    Allweis, Tanir
    Karni, Tami
    Sandbank, Judith
    Konichezky, Myriam
    Diment, Judith
    Guterman, Assaf
    Shapiro, Moshe
    Peles, Zachi
    Maishar, Roi
    Gur, Assaf
    Kolka, Eyal
    Brem, Rachel
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 114 (01) : 22 - 26
  • [3] Multicenter prospective study of magnetic resonance imaging prior to breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer
    Liu Qian
    Liu Yinhua
    Xu Ling
    Duan Xuening
    Li Ting
    Qin Naishan
    Kang Hua
    Jiang Hongchuan
    Yang Deqi
    Qu Xiang
    Jiang Zefei
    Yu Chengze
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 127 (13) : 2401 - 2406
  • [4] Intraoperative Margin Assessment in Wire-Localized Breast-Conserving Surgery for Invasive Cancer: A Population-Level Comparison of Techniques
    Laws, Alison
    Brar, Mantaj S.
    Bouchard-Fortier, Antoine
    Leong, Brad
    Quan, May Lynn
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 23 (10) : 3290 - 3296
  • [5] Clinical outcomes of an intraoperative surgical margin assessment using the fresh frozen section method in patients with invasive breast cancer undergoing breast-conserving surgery - a single center analysis
    Nowikiewicz, Tomasz
    Srutek, Ewa
    Glowacka-Mrotek, Iwona
    Tarkowska, Magdalena
    Zyromska, Agnieszka
    Zegarski, Wojciech
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9
  • [6] Intraoperative breast specimen assessment in breast conserving surgery: comparison between standard mammography imaging and a remote radiological system
    Mariscotti, Giovanna
    Durando, Manuela
    Pavan, Luca Jacopo
    Tagliafico, Alberto
    Campanino, Pier Paolo
    Castellano, Isabella
    Bussone, Riccardo
    Ala, Ada
    De Sanctis, Corrado
    Bergamasco, Laura
    Fonio, Paolo
    Houssami, Nehmat
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 93 (1109)
  • [7] Development of MRI Projection Mapping System for Breast-Conserving Surgery in the Operating Room: Preliminary Clinical Results in Invasive Breast Cancer
    Amano, Maki
    Kitabatake, Toshiaki
    Nakata, Otoichi
    Ichikawa, Yuko
    Inaba, Reiko
    Ito, Kazuyuki
    Ogura, Kanako
    Ozaki, Yutaka
    Kojima, Kuniaki
    Aoki, Shigeki
    Kuwatsuru, Ryohei
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 2020
  • [8] Radiopaque tissue transfer and X-ray system versus standard specimen radiography for intraoperative margin assessment in breast-conserving surgery: randomized clinical trial
    Stachs, Angrit
    Bollmann, Julia
    Martin, Annett
    Stubert, Johannes
    Reimer, Toralf
    Gerber, Bernd
    Hartmann, Steffi
    BJS OPEN, 2022, 6 (04):
  • [9] The application of intraoperative specimen mammography for margin status assessment in breast-conserving surgery: A single-center retrospective study
    Lin, Chen
    Wang, Kai-yue
    Xu, Fang
    Liu, Yan
    Li, Jin-fan
    Pan, Chi
    Hu, Kai-min
    Xu, Wen-hong
    Chen, Zhi-gang
    Chen, Yi-ding
    Pan, Tao
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2020, 26 (09) : 1871 - 1873
  • [10] Frozen section analysis for intraoperative margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery results in low rates of re-excision and local recurrence
    Olson, T. P.
    Harter, J.
    Munoz, A.
    Mahvi, D. M.
    Breslin, TM.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 14 (10) : 2953 - 2960