Semen providers and their three families

被引:19
作者
Daniels, K
Lalos, A [1 ]
Gottlieb, C
Lalos, O
机构
[1] Univ Umea Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, SE-90185 Umea, Sweden
[2] Univ Canterbury, Dept Social Work, Christchurch, New Zealand
[3] Sophiahemmet Hosp, IVF Unit, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Karolinska Hosp, Div Women & Child Hlth, S-10401 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
donor insemination; information sharing; semen provider; DI offspring; attitudes; family;
D O I
10.1080/01443610400022975
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Background: In 1985 the Swedish government introduced legislation that required all semen providers to furnish identifying information on themselves which would then be made available to their biological/provider offspring when they are deemed to have 'sufficient maturity'. The purpose of the legislation was to protect the child's rights and needs. The aim of this paper is to examine the degree to which semen providers have considered the implications of their decision to donate upon their three families; their birth family, the family they form with their partner, and the recipient family. Methods: Thirty semen providers from two Swedish clinics were sent self-completion questionnaires collecting both quantitative and qualitative information. The initial response rate,vas 100%. Questions requested demographic information,the degree to which semen providers had consulted with or advised their partners, family, existing offspring and acquaintances about their semen donation; views and attitudes of semen providers towards donor offspring, anonymity, information sharing, payments to semen providers, community acceptance of DI and semen providers, experience of donation, recruitment/screening procedures. Results: Almost all respondents had told their partners that they were providing semen, however, a much smaller proportion had told their birth families. Almost two thirds of semen providers were positive or very positive about the prospect of meeting their offspring at some time in the future, with older men expressing more enthusiasm. Conclusions: The findings suggest that semen providers have only partially considered and addressed the full implications of having semen provider offspring. The age of semen providers could be influential in determining some attitudes and views.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 22
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Donor insemination, the impact on family and child development [J].
Brewaeys, A .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 17 (01) :1-13
[2]  
BYGDEMAN M, 1991, ACTA OBSTET GYNECOL, V70, P265
[3]   THE SWEDISH INSEMINATION ACT AND THE AVAILABILITY OF DONORS [J].
DANIELS, K ;
LALOS, O .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1995, 10 (07) :1871-1874
[4]  
Daniels K R, 1998, Med Law Int, V3, P117
[5]   Semen donor recruitment strategies - a non-payment based approach [J].
Daniels, KR ;
Hall, DJ .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1997, 12 (10) :2330-2335
[6]   Families and donor insemination: The views of semen donors [J].
Daniels, KR ;
Ericsson, HL ;
Burn, IP .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WELFARE, 1996, 5 (04) :229-237
[7]  
Edvinsson A, 1990, Lakartidningen, V87, P1871
[8]   Disclosure of donor insemination to the child: the impact of Swedish legislation on couples' attitudes [J].
Gottlieb, C ;
Lalos, O ;
Lindblad, F .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2000, 15 (09) :2052-2056
[9]  
Hagenfeldt K, 1990, Lakartidningen, V87, P1849
[10]  
KLOCK SC, 1994, FERTIL STERIL, V62, P477