Common channel length predicts outcomes of biliopancreatic diversion alone and with the duodenal switch surgery

被引:30
作者
McConnell, DB [1 ]
O'Rourke, RW [1 ]
Deveney, CW [1 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Div Gen Surg, Portland VA Med Ctr, Portland, OR 97239 USA
关键词
biliopancreatic diversion; biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch; common channel;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.01.023
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The optimal common channel (CC) length for malabsorptive weight loss surgeries is unknown even though these surgeries were developed in the 1970s (biliopancreatic diversion [BPD]) and the 1990s (biliopancreatic diversion with a duodenal switch [BPD DS]). We hypothesized that the length of the CC correlates with a successful weight loss result. Methods: We evaluated 3 groups of patients based on the length of the CC whose duration of follow-up evaluation was at least I year. We reviewed all patients who had either an open BPD (5 patients) or a BPD DS (119 patients) from August 1998 to October 2003, for which D.B.M. was the participating surgeon. Results: Group I comprised 15 patients: their preoperative body mass index (BMI) was 53.9 kg/m(2); 73.3% of patients had a BMI more than 50, and the CC length was 150 cm. Group II comprised 76 patients: their preoperative BMI was 54.25 kg/m(2); 73.3% of patients had a BMI more than 50, and the CC length was 100 cm. Group III comprised 33 patients: their preoperative BMI was 60.1 kg/m(2); 84% of patients had a BMI more than 50, and the CC length was 80 to 90 cm. The mean weight loss in group I was 45 kg (44% mean excess weight loss). The mean weight loss in groups II and III was 55.8 and 61.5 kg, respectively (a 57% and 54.8% mean excess weight loss, respectively) (all P < .05 by analysis of variance). A weight loss of greater than 50% of excess body weight occurred in 40% of patients in group I versus 63% of patients in groups II and III combined (P < .01 by chi(2)). Conclusions: The length of the CC contributes significantly to successful excess weight loss in BPD and BPD DS patients. In general, the length of the CC should not exceed 100 cm. (c) 2005 Excerpta Medica Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:536 / 540
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Bariatric surgery - Surgery for weight control in patients with morbid obesity [J].
Balsiger, BM ;
Murr, MM ;
Poggio, JL ;
Sarr, MG .
MEDICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2000, 84 (02) :477-+
[2]   Bariatric surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Buchwald, H ;
Avidor, Y ;
Braunwald, E ;
Jensen, MD ;
Pories, W ;
Fahrbach, K ;
Schoelles, K .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 292 (14) :1724-1737
[3]  
Chapin BL, 1996, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V131, P1048
[4]   Surgery decreases long-term mortality, morbidity, and health care use in morbidly obese patients [J].
Christou, NV ;
Sampalis, JS ;
Liberman, M ;
Look, D ;
Auger, S ;
McLean, APH ;
MacLean, LD .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (03) :416-423
[5]   Roux-en-Y divided gastric bypass results in the same weight loss as duodenal switch for morbid obesity [J].
Deveney, CW ;
MacCabee, D ;
Marlink, K ;
Welker, K ;
Davis, J ;
McConnell, DB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2004, 187 (05) :655-659
[6]   A clinical and nutritional comparison of biliopancreatic diversion with and without duodenal switch [J].
Dolan, K ;
Hatzifotis, M ;
Newbury, L ;
Lowe, N ;
Fielding, G .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (01) :51-56
[7]   Impact of gastric bypass operation on survival: A population-based analysis [J].
Flum, DR ;
Dellinger, EP .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2004, 199 (04) :543-551
[8]   Biliopancreatic diversion with a duodenal switch [J].
Hess, DS ;
Hess, DW .
OBESITY SURGERY, 1998, 8 (03) :267-282
[9]   Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch [J].
Marceau, P ;
Hould, FS ;
Simard, S ;
Lebel, S ;
Bourque, RA ;
Potvin, M ;
Biron, S .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1998, 22 (09) :947-954
[10]   Does bone change after biliopancreatic diversion? [J].
Marceau, P ;
Biron, S ;
Lebel, S ;
Marceau, S ;
Hould, FS ;
Simard, S ;
Dumont, M ;
Fitzpatrick, LA .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2002, 6 (05) :690-698