Analysis of the prognostic implications of different tumour margin types in renal cell carcinoma

被引:27
作者
Thomas, DH
Verghese, A
Kynaston, HG
Griffiths, DFR
机构
[1] Cardiff Univ, Dept Pathol, Cardiff CF14 4XN, S Glam, Wales
[2] Doncaster Royal Infirm, Dept Histopathol, Doncaster DN2 5LT, England
[3] Univ Wales Hosp, Dept Urol, Cardiff CF4 4XW, S Glam, Wales
关键词
renal cell carcinoma; perinephric invasion; pathology; staging; survival; prognosis;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2559.2003.01721.x
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Aims: Invasion of perinephric tissues is part of the Union Internationale Contre le Cancer ( UICC) ( 1997) T staging criteria for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and appears to confer a worse prognosis. However, there are no established histological criteria to determine if this has occurred and histopathologists differ in their interpretation of the tumour margin. The purpose of this study was to determine histological criteria for invasion of perinephric tissues that may be used in staging. Methods and results: We assessed the prognostic implications of different margin types in 176 cases of RCC with good follow-up data. The tumour margin type in each cases was classified as follows: fibrous tumour capsule; rim of kidney; fibrous capsule with 'collar stud' invasion; pushing margin, no capsule; and tumour cell invasion of fat. The margin types were used in univariate and multivariate survival analysis to determine which had most impact on disease-free survival. In Cox regression analysis with all other influential covariates cellular invasion of fat was the only margin type that had any prognostic impact, conferring a 2.9 relative hazard compared with tumours with a fibrous capsule ( P = 0.007). Conclusions: For staging purposes the designation of a tumour as invading perinephric tissues should be limited to those cases that have tumour cells invading the perinephric fat.
引用
收藏
页码:374 / 380
页数:7
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA .2. HISTOLOGICAL INDICATORS OF PROGNOSIS
    DELAHUNT, B
    NACEY, JN
    [J]. PATHOLOGY, 1987, 19 (03) : 258 - 263
  • [2] Delahunt B, 1998, SEMIN DIAGN PATHOL, V15, P68
  • [3] PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE OF MORPHOLOGIC PARAMETERS IN RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA
    FUHRMAN, SA
    LASKY, LC
    LIMAS, C
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 1982, 6 (07) : 655 - 663
  • [4] Gelb AB, 1997, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V80, P981
  • [5] STAGE-I RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA - A CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL STUDY OF 82 CASES
    GELB, AB
    SHIBUYA, RB
    WEISS, LM
    MEDEIROS, LJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 1993, 17 (03) : 275 - 286
  • [6] Contribution of grade, vascular invasion and age to outcome in clinically localized renal cell carcinoma
    Griffiths, DFR
    Verghese, A
    Golash, A
    Kynaston, HG
    Matthews, PN
    Hart, AJL
    Court, JB
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 90 (01) : 26 - 31
  • [7] Kovacs G, 1997, J PATHOL, V183, P131, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199710)183:2<131::AID-PATH931>3.0.CO
  • [8] 2-G
  • [9] PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA
    LANIGAN, D
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 75 (05): : 565 - 571
  • [10] *UICC, 1997, TNM CLASS MAL TUM