Does a ring pessary in situ influence the pelvic floor muscle function of women with pelvic organ prolapse when tested in supine?

被引：3

作者：

Bo, Kari ^{[1
,2
]}

Majida, Memona ^{[3
,4
]}

Engh, Marie Ellstrom ^{[3
,4
]}

机构：

[1] Akershus Univ Hosp, Norwegian Sch Sports Sci, Dept Sports Med, Lorenskog, Norway

[2] Akershus Univ Hosp, Norwegian Sch Sports Sci, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Lorenskog, Norway

[3] Akershus Univ Hosp, Inst Clin Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Lorenskog, Norway

[4] Univ Oslo, Oslo, Norway

来源：

INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL | 2012年 / 23卷 / 05期

关键词：

Measurement; Pelvic floor muscles; Pessary; Strength; Vaginal resting pressure; VAGINAL PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS; STRESS URINARY-INCONTINENCE; PREVALENCE; STRENGTH; DISORDERS; EXERCISE; POSITION; HIATUS;

D O I：

10.1007/s00192-011-1598-6

中图分类号：

R71 [妇产科学];

学科分类号：

100211 ;

摘要：

It has been suggested that repositioning pelvic organ prolapse (POP) by pessary support may improve pelvic floor muscle (PFM) function. The aim of the present study was to compare vaginal resting pressure and maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) of the PFM measured with and without a ring pessary in situ. This was a short-term experimental study with women acting as their own controls. Twenty-two women with POP quantified II-IV were included. Vaginal resting pressure and MVC was measured with a manometer (Camtech AS) in supine position. Difference between measurements with and without the ring pessary was analyzed by paired sample t test and Wilcoxon signed rank test. Significance level was < 0.05. There was a statistically significant difference in measurement of vaginal resting pressure (p < 0.01) but not of MVC (p = < 0.68) with the ring pessary in situ. Measurement of PFM strength can be done without repositioning the prolapse.

引用

页码：573 / 577

页数：5

共 24 条

[1] Is there any difference in measurement of pelvic floor muscle strength in supine and standing position? [J].

Bo, K ;

Finckenhagen, HB .

ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2003, 82 (12) :1120-1124

[2] PELVIC FLOOR MUSCLE EXERCISE FOR THE TREATMENT OF FEMALE STRESS URINARY-INCONTINENCE .1. RELIABILITY OF VAGINAL PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS OF PELVIC FLOOR MUSCLE STRENGTH [J].

BO, K ;

KVARSTEIN, B ;

HAGEN, R ;

LARSEN, S .

NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 1990, 9 (05) :471-477

[3] PELVIC FLOOR MUSCLE EXERCISE FOR THE TREATMENT OF FEMALE STRESS URINARY-INCONTINENCE .2. VALIDITY OF VAGINAL PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS OF PELVIC FLOOR MUSCLE STRENGTH AND THE NECESSITY OF SUPPLEMENTARY METHODS FOR CONTROL OF CORRECT CONTRACTION [J].

BO, K ;

KVARSTEIN, B ;

HAGEN, RR ;

LARSEN, S .

NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 1990, 9 (05) :479-487

[4] PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS DURING PELVIC FLOOR MUSCLE CONTRACTIONS - THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT POSITIONS OF THE VAGINAL MEASURING DEVICE [J].

BO, K .

NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 1992, 11 (02) :107-113

[5]

Braekken IH, 2010, NEUROUROL URODYNAM, V29, P1167

[6] Pelvic floor function is independently associated with pelvic organ prolapse [J].

Braekken, I. H. ;

Majida, M. ;

Engh, M. Ellstrom ;

Holme, I. M. ;

Bo, K. .

BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2009, 116 (13) :1706-1714

[7] Can pelvic floor muscle training reverse pelvic organ prolapse and reduce prolapse symptoms? An assessor-blinded, randomized, controlled trial [J].

Braekken, Ingeborg Hoff ;

Majida, Memona ;

Engh, Marie Ellstrom ;

Bo, Kari .

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 203 (02) :170.e1-170.e7

[8]

Brækken IH, 2010, OBSTET GYNECOL, V115, P317, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181cbd35f

[9]

Brubaker L, 2002, INCONTINENCE, 2ND EDITION, P243

[10] The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction [J].

Bump, RC ;

Mattiasson, A ;

Bo, K ;

Brubaker, LP ;

DeLancey, JOL ;

Klarskov, P ;

Shull, BL ;

Smith, ARB .

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 175 (01) :10-17

← 1 2 3 →