Evaluation of the functional results and safety of early removal of the urethral catheter after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

被引:0
|
作者
Kotov, S., V [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Guspanov, R., I [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Byadretdinov, I. Sh [1 ]
Ryabov, M. A. [3 ]
Pulbere, S. A. [1 ,2 ]
Yusufov, A. G. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhilov, M. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] NI Pirogov Russian Natl Res Med Univ, Minist Hlth Russia, 1 Ostrovityanova St, Moscow 117997, Russia
[2] NI Pirogov Russian Natl 1, Moscow Healthcare Dept, 8 Leninskiy Prospekt, Moscow 119049, Russia
[3] Clin & Diagnost Ctr MEDSI Krasnaya Presnya, 16 Krasnaya Presnya St, Moscow 123242, Russia
来源
ONKOUROLOGIYA | 2022年 / 18卷 / 01期
关键词
prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy; urinary continence; urethral catheter removal; URINARY-INCONTINENCE; VESICOURETHRAL ANASTOMOSIS; RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; COMPLICATIONS; METAANALYSIS; OUTCOMES; IMPACT; MEN;
D O I
10.17650/1726-9776-2022-18-1-38-47
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background. Currently, there is no single point of view on the timing of safe removal of the urethral catheter in patients who have undergone laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Objective of the study: to evaluate the safety and functional results of early removal of the urethral catheter after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Materials and methods. In the period from January 2020 until April 2021, the study included 100 patients with a diagnosis of prostate cancer who underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by one surgeon. Patients were divided into 2 groups. Group A (n = 50) included patients with the urethral catheter removed on the second day after surgery. Group B (n = 50) the control group - included patients with standard catheter removal (14 days). Results. According to the results of cystography, in group A extravasation of a contrast agent from the zone of urethro-vesical anastomosis was determined in 3 (6 %) cases. Seven (14 %) patients developed acute urinary retention after the removal of the urethral catheter. Among 2 patients acute urinary retention occurred immediately after catheter removal. In 5 cases acute urinary retention developed 2-7 days after catheter removal. These patients underwent repeated catheterization for a period of 2-3 days. In our study, removal of the urethral catheter on the second day increased the dynamic of restoring urinary continence in the postoperative period. The frequency of complete recovery of urinary continence (0-1 pad per day) in the groups A and B, respectively, was: after 1 month - 22 and 16 %, after 6 months - 64 and 54 %, after 12 months - 78 and 78 %. Urinary incontinence in the groups A and B was as follows: mild (2-3 pads per day): after 1 month - 40 and 34 %, after 6 months - 30 and 32 %, after 12 months - 20 and 18 %; moderate (4-5 pads per day): after 1 month - 20 and 26 %, after 6 months - 6 and 10 %, after 12 months - 2 and 2 %; severe (6 pads or more): after 1 month - 18 and 24 %, after 6 months - 0 and 4 %, after 12 months - 0 and 2 %. Conclusion. Early removal of the urethral catheter (2 days) in patients who underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is a relatively safe method that improves the restoration of urinary continence.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 47
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Neither α-blocker therapy nor cystography is required before early catheter removal after radical prostatectomy
    Nieder, AM
    Manoharan, M
    Kim, SS
    Soloway, MS
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 95 (03) : 323 - 325
  • [32] The effect of BMI on clinicopathologic and functional outcomes after open radical prostatectomy
    Mandel, Philipp
    Kretschmer, Alexander
    Chandrasekar, Thenappan
    Nguyen, Hao G.
    Buchner, Alexander
    Stief, Christian G.
    Tilki, Derya
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2014, 32 (03) : 297 - 302
  • [33] Optimization of an early discharge program after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Diaz, F. J.
    de la Pena, E.
    Hernandez, V.
    Lopez, B.
    de la Morena, J. M.
    Martin, M. D.
    Jimenez-Valladolid, I.
    Llorente, C.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2014, 38 (06): : 355 - 360
  • [34] Urethral catheter entrapped in vesicourethral anastomotic sutures after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy successfully removed by transurethral approach
    Yoshihara, Kentaro
    Tashiro, Kojiro
    Kimura, Shoji
    Yasue, Keiji
    Urabe, Fumihiko
    Yamada, Hiroki
    Kimura, Takahiro
    IJU CASE REPORTS, 2024, 7 (04) : 333 - 335
  • [35] Minimal residual membranous urethral length and membranous urethral length predict poor recovery from incontinence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and after open radical prostatectomy
    Ohara, Eiichiro
    Kawamorita, Naoki
    Satake, Yohei
    Kaiho, Yasuhiro
    Mitsuzuka, Koji
    Saito, Hideo
    Ishidoya, Shigeto
    Arai, Yoichi
    Ito, Akihiro
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 29 (12) : 1517 - 1523
  • [36] The natural history of voiding function after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Wang, Lushun
    Chung, Stephanie Fook-Chong Man
    Yip, Sidney Kam Hung
    Lau, Weber Kam On
    Cheng, Christopher Wai Sam
    Sim, Hong Gee
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2011, 29 (02) : 177 - 182
  • [37] Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Preliminary results
    Jacob, F
    Salomon, L
    Hoznek, A
    Bellot, J
    Antiphon, P
    Chopin, DK
    Abbou, CC
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2000, 37 (05) : 615 - 620
  • [38] Impact of tamsulosin on urinary retention following early catheter removal after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A prospective randomized controlled trial
    Jeong, In Gab
    You, Dalsan
    Yoon, Jong Hyun
    Hong, Sungwoo
    Lim, Ju Hyun
    Hong, Jun Hyuk
    Choo, Myung-Soo
    Ahn, Hanjong
    Kim, Choung-Soo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 21 (02) : 164 - 168
  • [39] Intrafascial Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy with a Laparoscopic Robot-Assisted Extraperitoneal Approach: Early Oncological and Functional Results
    Xylinas, Evanguelos
    Ploussard, Guillaume
    Salomon, Laurent
    Paul, Alexandre
    Gillion, Norman
    De Laet, Kevin
    Vordos, Dimitri
    Hoznek, Andras
    Abbou, Clement-Claude
    de la Taille, Alexandre
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 (04) : 577 - 582
  • [40] Comparison of the initial robot-assisted radical prostatectomy results with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Agreda, Fernando
    Raventos, Carles
    Planos, Jacques
    Trilla, Enrique
    Morote, Juan
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2014, 67 (02): : 185 - 190