When should re-consent of subjects participating in a clinical trial be requested?: A case-oriented algorithm to assist in the decision-making process

被引:13
作者
Dal-Re, R. [1 ]
Avendano, C. [2 ]
Gil-Aguado, A. [3 ]
Gracia, D. [4 ]
Caplan, A. L. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] GlaxoSmithKline SA, Dept Med, Madrid, Spain
[2] Autonomous Univ Madrid, Hierro Univ Hosp, Clin Puerta, Dept Clin Pharmacol, E-28049 Madrid, Spain
[3] Autonomous Univ Madrid, La Paz Univ Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Madrid, Spain
[4] Univ Complutense Madrid, Sch Med, Dept Publ Hlth & Hist Sci, Madrid, Spain
[5] Univ Penn, Dept Med Eth, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[6] Univ Penn, Ctr Bioeth, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1038/sj.clpt.6100357
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Investigators, sponsors, and institutional review boards have to decide when re-consent of clinical trials' participants must be obtained when new information becomes available. We present an algorithm to help in the decision-making process, which takes into consideration the kind of new information, the risk of exposure ( patients could be on the treatment or in the follow-up phases), and the possibility of managing the case. Re-consent should be obtained in three of the eight possible situations.
引用
收藏
页码:788 / 793
页数:6
相关论文
共 6 条
[1]  
The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects for research, Fed Register, 44, pp. 23192-23197, (1979)
[2]  
Levine R.J., Informed consent, Ethics and Regulation of Clinical Research, pp. 95-155, (1986)
[3]  
International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. ICH Tripartite Guideline for Good Clinical Practice, (1996)
[4]  
International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects, (2002)
[5]  
Code of Federal Regulations, 45, PART 46
[6]  
Wendler D., Rackoff J., Consent for continuing research participation, IRB, 24, pp. 1-6, (2002)