Goal achievement ofHbA1candLDL-cholesterol in a randomized trial comparing colesevelam with ezetimibe:GOAL-RCT

Aim To compare the efficacy and safety of colesevelam and ezetimibe as second-line low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-c)-lowering options in type 2 diabetes (T2D). Materials and Methods GOAL-RCT is a 24-week, open-label, randomized, pragmatic clinical trial. Subjects with T2D with uncontrolled HbA1c (7.1%-10%) and LDL-c (>2.0 mmol/L) were randomized 1:1 to colesevelam 3.75 g or ezetimibe 10 mg daily. The primary composite outcome was the proportion of participants achieving an LDL-c target of <= 2.0 mmol/L and HbA1c target of <= 7.0%. Intention to treat analysis was performed. Results Two hundred subjects were enrolled: mean age 59 +/- 10 years; mean HbA1c 8.0%; mean LDL-c 2.5 mmol/L; 97% on statin therapy. The primary composite outcome was achieved by similar proportions of participants with colesevelam (14.6%) and ezetimibe (10.5%) (Pnon-inferiority < .001,P-superiority= .41). LDL-c reduction from baseline was less with colesevelam compared with ezetimibe (14.0% vs. 23.2%,P < .01), as was the proportion of subjects achieving an LDL-c target of <= 2.0 mmol/L (47.6% and 67.0%, respectively;P= .007). Mean HbA1c was reduced with colesevelam (-0.26 +/- 0.10%), while no change was observed with ezetimibe (differenceP= .06). Adverse events and discontinuation rates were higher for colesevelam (20.2% and 31.1%) compared with ezetimibe (7.2% and 6.2%), respectively. Conclusions Among subjects with T2D, the initiation of colesevelam or ezetimibe led to similar achievement of primary composite outcome (LDL-c and HbA1c within target), with ezetimibe recording a greater LDL-c reduction and better tolerability than colesevelam.