CCD film digitizers in clinical practice: evaluation of the main properties

被引:4
作者
Baruffaldi, F
Angelini, AL
Testi, D
Mattioli, P
Pierotti, L
机构
[1] Ist Ortoped Rizzoli, Lab Tecnol Med, I-40136 Bologna, Italy
[2] Azienda Osped Bologna, Policlin S Orsola Malpighi, Serv Fis Sanit, I-40138 Bologna, Italy
来源
MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND THE INTERNET IN MEDICINE | 2001年 / 26卷 / 02期
关键词
x-ray films digitizer; Telemedicine; Teleradiology; PACS;
D O I
10.1080/14639230110055604
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Until hospitals convert to 'filmless' radiology departments, computerized display and archival of x-ray images will necessitate devices to transform conventional X-ray films into digital images. Current methods for digitizing x-ray films include laser based and Charged Couple Device (CCD) based scanners. There is now much interest in the use of CCD devices for demanding applications, with the lower cost of ownership contributing towards the diffusion of CCD scanners. We report a study comparing the performance of three CCD based systems (an x-ray film digitizer, and two low cost flatbed scanners), looking at characteristic curve, useful optical range with respect to the noise, repeatability, Modulation Transfer Function (MTF), and geometric distortion. In addition, we evaluated the potential and limitations of these devices in the clinical assessment of x-ray films. The most important weakness of CCD devices derived from the stability and the noise of CCD detectors, mostly affecting the useful optical range in the darker regions of x-ray films. Spatial resolution and geometric distortion were confirmed to be the real points of strength of CCD technology. Therefore, the most appropriate system for each user depends on what type of clinical decision will be made following inspection of the digitised images.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 114
页数:14
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC ANALYSIS OF FRACTURE AND PNEUMONIA DETECTION - COMPARISON OF LASER-DIGITIZED WORKSTATION IMAGES AND CONVENTIONAL ANALOG RADIOGRAPHS [J].
ACKERMAN, SJ ;
GITLIN, JN ;
GAYLER, RW ;
FLAGLE, CD ;
BRYAN, RN .
RADIOLOGY, 1993, 186 (01) :263-268
[2]  
*AM COLL RAD, 1994, ACR STAND TEL
[3]  
Borasi G, 1990, Radiol Med, V80, P339
[4]  
Cannavo M J, 1999, Telemed Today, V7, P34
[5]   DIGITIZING OF RADIOGRAPHS WITH A FLAT-BED SCANNER [J].
CHEN, SK ;
HOLLENDER, L .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1995, 23 (04) :205-208
[6]   DETECTION OF BREAST ABNORMALITIES ON TELERADIOLOGY TRANSMITTED MAMMOGRAMS [J].
FAJARDO, LL ;
YOSHINO, MT ;
SEELEY, GW ;
HUNT, R ;
HUNTER, TB ;
FRIEDMAN, R ;
CARDENAS, D ;
BOYLE, R .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1990, 25 (10) :1111-1115
[7]   NEW HIGH-RESOLUTION TELERADIOLOGY SYSTEM - PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY IN 685 TRANSMITTED CLINICAL CASES [J].
GOLDBERG, MA ;
ROSENTHAL, DI ;
CHEW, FS ;
BLICKMAN, JG ;
MILLER, SW ;
MUELLER, PR .
RADIOLOGY, 1993, 186 (02) :429-434
[8]   An evaluation of the signal and noise characteristics of four CCD-based film digitizers [J].
Hangiandreou, NJ ;
O'Connor, TJ ;
Felmlee, JP .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 25 (10) :2020-2026
[9]  
Harris G, 1999, Telemed Today, V7, P27
[10]   COMPARISON OF 2048-LINE DIGITAL-DISPLAY FORMATS AND CONVENTIONAL RADIOGRAPHS - AN ROC STUDY [J].
HAYRAPETIAN, A ;
ABERLE, DR ;
HUANG, HK ;
FISKE, R ;
MORIOKA, C ;
VALENTINO, D ;
BOECHAT, MI .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1989, 152 (05) :1113-1118