Comparison of 5-year outcomes and quality of life between endovenous laser (980 nm) and microwave ablation combined with high ligation for varicose veins

被引:5
作者
Fan, Pengcheng [1 ]
Cong, Longlong [1 ]
Dong, Jian [1 ]
Han, Yang [1 ]
Yang, Lin [1 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Vasc Surg, Affiliated Hosp 1, Xian, Peoples R China
关键词
varicose veins; laser ablation; microwave ablation; long-term outcome varicose veins; long-term outcome; high ligation; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; PRACTICE-GUIDELINES; FOAM SCLEROTHERAPY; VASCULAR-SURGERY; POPULATION; RECURRENCE; MANAGEMENT; SOCIETY; SYSTEM; REFLUX;
D O I
10.3389/fsurg.2022.1022439
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Our study aims to evaluateand compare the long-term results of endovenous laser (EVLA) and microwave ablation (EMA) combined with high ligation in treating varicose veins (VVs). A total of 122 patients (150 legs) underwent EMA combined with high ligation, and 127 patients (167 legs) underwent EVLA procedures (980 nm) combined with high ligation in this retrospective study. Outcomes included the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) score, the Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS), clinical recurrence of VVs and patient satisfaction duringthe 5-year follow-up.During the 5-year follow-up, patients who underwent the EVLA procedure showed a higher recurrence of VVs than those who underwent the EMA procedure (22.75% vs. 13.33%, P = 0.03, odds ratio (OR): 1.91, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06-3.45), especially at the primary site (6% vs. 14.37%, P = 0.01; OR: 2.63; 95% CI: 1.21-5.72). VV recurrence within 3 years was higher in patients who underwent EVLA than in those who underwent the EMA procedure (73.68% vs. 40%, P = 0.01; OR: 4.2; 95% CI: 1.37-12.86). Compared with those at baseline, the AVVQ score, VCSS and EQ-5D score improved significantly at 5 years for patients who underwent either procedure (P < 0.01); however, the VCSS and AVVQ score were higher for patients who underwent the EVLA procedure (P = 0.05). The patient reintervention rate was higher for EVLA than for EMA (14.79% vs. 7.33%, P = 0.033; OR: 2.19; 95% CI: 2.06-5.34). Our results confirmed that EMA and EVLA improve the QoL of patients and that EMA combined with high ligation demonstrates lower 5-year recurrence, especially at primary sites.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, J SURG OXFORD, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.MPSUR.2016.02.002, 10.1016/j.mpsur.2016.02.002]
[2]   The effectiveness of various interventions versus standard stripping in patients with varicose veins in terms of quality of life [J].
Argyriou, Christos ;
Papasideris, Christos ;
Antoniou, George A. ;
Georgakarakos, Efstratios ;
Papanas, Nikolaos ;
Lazarides, Miltos K. ;
Georgiadis, George S. .
PHLEBOLOGY, 2018, 33 (07) :439-450
[3]   The epidemiology of chronic venous insufficiency and varicose veins [J].
Beebe-Dimmer, JL ;
Pfeifer, JR ;
Engle, JS ;
Schottenfeld, D .
ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 15 (03) :175-184
[4]   Microwave Ablation Technology: What Every User Should Know [J].
Brace, Christopher L. .
CURRENT PROBLEMS IN DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY, 2009, 38 (02) :61-67
[5]   Randomized clinical trial of endovenous laser ablation compared with conventional surgery for great saphenous varicose veins [J].
Carradice, D. ;
Mekako, A. I. ;
Mazari, F. A. K. ;
Samuel, N. ;
Hatfield, J. ;
Chetter, I. C. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 98 (04) :501-510
[6]   Duplex Ultrasound Investigation of the Veins of the Lower Limbs after Treatment for Varicose Veins - UIP Consensus Document [J].
De Maeseneer, M. ;
Pichot, O. ;
Cavezzi, A. ;
Earnshaw, J. ;
van Rij, A. ;
Lurie, F. ;
Smith, P. C. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 42 (01) :89-102
[7]   Ten-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial comparing saphenofemoral ligation and stripping of the great saphenous vein with endovenous laser ablation (980 nm) using local tumescent anesthesia [J].
Eggen, Celine A. M. ;
Alozai, Tamana ;
Pronk, Pascal ;
Mooij, Michael C. ;
Gaastra, Menno T. W. ;
Unlu, Cagdas ;
Schreve, Michiel A. ;
van Vlijmen, Clarissa J. .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY-VENOUS AND LYMPHATIC DISORDERS, 2022, 10 (03) :646-+
[8]   The care of patients with varicose veins and associated chronic venous diseases: Clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery and the American Venous Forum [J].
Gloviczki, Peter ;
Comerota, Anthony J. ;
Dalsing, Michael C. ;
Eklof, Bo G. ;
Gillespie, David L. ;
Gloviczki, Monika L. ;
Lohr, Joann M. ;
McLafferty, Robert B. ;
Meissner, Mark H. ;
Murad, M. Hassan ;
Padberg, Frank T. ;
Pappas, Peter J. ;
Passman, Marc A. ;
Raffetto, Joseph D. ;
Vasquez, Michael A. ;
Wakefield, Thomas W. .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 53 :2S-48S
[9]   Randomized clinical trial of endovenous laser ablation versus direct and indirect radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of great saphenous varicose veins [J].
Hamann, S. A. S. ;
Timmer-de Mik, L. ;
Fritschy, W. M. ;
Kuiters, G. R. R. ;
Nijsten, T. E. C. ;
van den Bos, R. R. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 106 (08) :998-1004
[10]   Validation of the new venous severity scoring system in varicose vein surgery [J].
Kakkos, SK ;
Rivera, MA ;
Matsagas, MI ;
Lazarides, MK ;
Robless, P ;
Belcaro, G ;
Geroulakos, G .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2003, 38 (02) :224-228