The effect of prophylactic uterine artery embolization on reproductive outcomes in patients with cesarean scar pregnancy: a propensity score-matched study

被引:3
作者
Wang, Jiao [1 ]
Wang, Dandan [1 ]
Zhang, Xinyue [2 ]
Liu, Yuting [1 ]
Yang, Qing [1 ]
Zhang, Ningning [1 ]
机构
[1] China Med Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Shengjing Hosp, 36 Sanhao St, Shenyang 110004, Peoples R China
[2] Inner Mongolia Med Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Affiliated Hosp, Hohhot 010050, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Uterine artery embolization; Cesarean scar pregnancy; Fertility; HYSTEROSCOPY; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1007/s00404-021-06347-6
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Purpose This study aimed to investigate the effect of prophylactic uterine artery embolization (UAE) on reproductive outcomes in patients with cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP). Methods A retrospective case-control study was conducted using the hospital records of all women diagnosed with CSP during a period of 6 years, between January 2014 and December 2019, at Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University. The clinical characteristics and different treatment modalities were analyzed. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 181 patients with reproductive needs were selected and divided into a UAE group (n = 51) and a non-UAE group (n = 130) according to whether they received preventive UAE before their hysteroscopic or laparoscopic operation. The basic characteristics and pregnancy outcomes of patients in each group were compared, and a propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was used to produce 37 matched pairs. Results Before PSM, the UAE group had a thinner muscle layer, larger mass size, and higher serum human chorionic gonadotropin level than the non-UAE group. The pregnancy rate and live birth rate of the UAE group were 54.9% and 61.9%, respectively, which were lower than those of the non-UAE group (61.5% and 66.7%), but no statistical differences were observed. Post-PSM, no significant differences between basic characteristics of the groups were observed. The pregnancy rate of the UAE group was 51.4%, which was lower than that of the non-UAE group (73.0%); the live birth rate of the UAE group was 64.3%, which was also lower than that of the non-UAE group (72.7%); however, the differences were not statistically significant with the P value of 0.077 and 0.716. Conclusion Prophylactic UAE did not induce a significant difference in pregnancy rate and live birth rate between the UAE group and the non-UAE group.
引用
收藏
页码:651 / 659
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Reproductive outcomes of women with a previous history of Caesarean scar ectopic pregnancies
    Ben Nagi, J.
    Helmy, S.
    Ofili-Yebovi, D.
    Yazbek, J.
    Sawyer, E.
    Jurkovic, D.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2007, 22 (07) : 2012 - 2015
  • [2] Uterine artery embolization in cesarean scar pregnancy: safe and effective intervention
    Cao Shasha
    Zhu Lihong
    Jin Long
    Gao Jian
    Chen Chen
    [J]. CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 127 (12) : 2322 - 2326
  • [3] Fertility, Pregnancy, and Clinical Outcomes after Uterine Arteriovenous Malformation Management
    Delplanque, Sophie
    Le Lous, Maela
    Proisy, Maia
    Joueidi, Yolaine
    Bauville, Estelle
    Rozel, Celine
    Beraud, Eugenie
    Bruneau, Bertrand
    Leveque, Jean
    Lavoue, Vincent
    Timoh, Krystel Nyangoh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 26 (01) : 153 - 161
  • [4] Uterine Artery Embolization and Methotrexate Infusion as Sole Management for Caesarean Scar and Cervical Ectopic Pregnancies: A Single-Center Experience and Literature Review
    Elmokadem, Ali H.
    Abdel-Wahab, Rihame M.
    El-Zayadi, Ahmed A.
    Elrakhawy, Mohamed M.
    [J]. CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES, 2019, 70 (03): : 307 - 316
  • [5] Ectopic pregnancy within a cesarean scar: A review.
    Fylstra, DL
    [J]. OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2002, 57 (08) : 537 - 543
  • [6] Reproductive outcomes following cesarean scar pregnancy - a case series and review of the literature
    Gao, Lufen
    Huang, Zhongwei
    Zhang, Xian
    Zhou, Na
    Huang, Xinke
    Wang, Xiaoyu
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2016, 200 : 102 - 107
  • [7] Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Systematic Review
    Gonzalez, Natalia
    Tulandi, Togas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 24 (05) : 731 - 738
  • [8] Hoffman Taryn, 2020, Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med, V4, P65, DOI 10.5811/cpcem.2019.10.43988
  • [9] Updates in uterine artery embolization for leiomyomas
    Kim, Annie
    Arabkhazaeli, Moona
    Ulrich, Amanda
    Lerner, Veronica
    Shin, Ja Hyun
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 32 (04) : 269 - 276
  • [10] The effects of uterine artery embolization on ovarian reserve
    Kim, Chang-Woon
    Shim, Haeng Seon
    Jang, Hong
    Song, Yun Gyu
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2016, 206 : 172 - 176