A general rule for sensory cue summation: evidence from photographic, musical, phonetic and cross-modal stimuli

被引:19
作者
To, M. P. S. [1 ]
Baddeley, R. J. [2 ]
Troscianko, T. [2 ]
Tolhurst, D. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Physiol Dev & Neurosci, Cambridge CB2 3EG, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Dept Expt Psychol, Bristol BS8 1TU, Avon, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
natural images; music; phonetics; cross-modal; feature integration; neuronal correlation; NATURAL IMAGES; BINDING; DISCRIMINATION; INTEGRATION; INFORMATION; PERCEPTION; ATTENTION; RESPONSES; NEURONS; MODELS;
D O I
10.1098/rspb.2010.1888
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The Euclidean and MAX metrics have been widely used to model cue summation psychophysically and computationally. Both rules happen to be special cases of a more general Minkowski summation rule (Cue(1)(m) + Cue(2)(m))(1/m), where m = 2 and infinity, respectively. In vision research, Minkowski summation with power m = 3-4 has been shown to be a superior model of how subthreshold components sum to give an overall detection threshold. Recently, we have previously reported that Minkowski summation with power m = 2.84 accurately models summation of suprathreshold visual cues in photographs. In four suprathreshold discrimination experiments, we confirm the previous findings with new visual stimuli and extend the applicability of this rule to cue combination in auditory stimuli (musical sequences and phonetic utterances, where m = 2.95 and 2.54, respectively) and cross-modal stimuli (m = 2.56). In all cases, Minkowski summation with power m = 2.5-3 outperforms the Euclidean and MAX operator models. We propose that this reflects the summation of neuronal responses that are not entirely independent but which show some correlation in their magnitudes. Our findings are consistent with electrophysiological research that demonstrates signal correlations (r = 0.1-0.2) between sensory neurons when these are presented with natural stimuli.
引用
收藏
页码:1365 / 1372
页数:8
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   TOWARD A UNIFIED THEORY OF SIMILARITY AND RECOGNITION [J].
ASHBY, FG ;
PERRIN, NA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1988, 95 (01) :124-150
[2]   Decorrelated Neuronal Firing in Cortical Microcircuits [J].
Ecker, Alexander S. ;
Berens, Philipp ;
Keliris, Georgios A. ;
Bethge, Matthias ;
Logothetis, Nikos K. ;
Tolias, Andreas S. .
SCIENCE, 2010, 327 (5965) :584-587
[3]   A MULTIDIMENSIONAL STOCHASTIC-THEORY OF SIMILARITY [J].
ENNIS, DM ;
PALEN, JJ ;
MULLEN, K .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 32 (04) :449-465
[4]   Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Fox, Michael D. ;
Raichle, Marcus E. .
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2007, 8 (09) :700-711
[5]   Responses of primate visual cortical V4 neurons to simultaneously presented stimuli [J].
Gawne, TJ ;
Martin, JM .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 88 (03) :1128-1135
[6]  
GAWNE TJ, 1993, J NEUROSCI, V13, P2758
[7]   Edge co-occurrence in natural images predicts contour grouping performance [J].
Geisler, WS ;
Perry, JS ;
Super, BJ ;
Gallogly, DP .
VISION RESEARCH, 2001, 41 (06) :711-724
[8]   Specialized representations in visual cortex: A role for binding? [J].
Ghose, GM ;
Maunsell, J .
NEURON, 1999, 24 (01) :79-85
[9]   DETECTION OF MULTIPLE COMPONENT SIGNALS IN NOISE [J].
GREEN, DM .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1958, 30 (10) :904-911
[10]   RECEPTIVE FIELDS AND FUNCTIONAL ARCHITECTURE OF MONKEY STRIATE CORTEX [J].
HUBEL, DH ;
WIESEL, TN .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1968, 195 (01) :215-&