Cooperative quality investment in outsourcing

被引:61
作者
Chen, Jingxian [1 ,2 ]
Liang, Liang [1 ]
Yang, Feng [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Management, Hefei 230026, Peoples R China
[2] Nantong Univ, Sch Business, Nantong 226019, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Supply chain; Outsourcing; Cooperation; Competition; Quality improvement; Game theory; PRODUCT QUALITY; SUPPLY CHAIN; PRICE-COMPETITION; QUANTITY COMPETITION; DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL; SERVICE COMPETITION; SHARING CONTRACTS; COMMON RETAILER; IMPROVEMENT; DECISIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.01.019
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This paper highlights the importance of having a cooperative quality investment (CQI) strategy and proposes a simple proportional investment sharing schedule in the outsourcing of a supply chain, which consists of a contract manufacturer (CM, the supplier) and two competitive original equipment manufacturers (OEMs, the buyers), the demands of which are sensitive to both price and product quality. A three-stage dynamic game-theoretic framework is applied to describe decisions of every entity. Specifically, we analyze three possible decision structures for the quality choice: the CM optimally sets the product quality, and two OEMs cooperatively or noncooperatively set the product quality. By the backward induction approach, we obtain the analytical equilibrium solutions for each decision scenario. We determine that the CM's share of quality investment expenses is sufficiently large, and the CQI strategy will be beneficial to quality enhancement regardless of who sets the product quality level. With respect to the equilibrium payoffs (profits), this study shows that the CM always prefers to have complete control of the quality choice when there is implementation of the CQI strategy, while the OEMs are always hurt by this strategy, except when they cooperate on the quality decision with a rather large CM share. In addition, the whole supply chain's profit can be improved by practicing the CQI strategy. Furthermore, we explicitly propose the conditions for realizing this improvement. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 191
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Information, contracting, and quality costs [J].
Baiman, S ;
Fischer, PE ;
Rajan, MV .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2000, 46 (06) :776-789
[2]   Quality and competition [J].
Banker, RD ;
Khosla, I ;
Sinha, KK .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1998, 44 (09) :1179-1192
[3]   Outsourcing via service competition [J].
Benjaafar, Saif ;
Elahi, Ehsan ;
Donohue, Karen L. .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2007, 53 (02) :241-259
[4]  
Boyaci T., 2003, Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, V5, P18, DOI 10.1287/msom.5.1.18.12757
[5]   Supply chain coordination with revenue-sharing contracts: Strengths and limitations [J].
Cachon, GP ;
Lariviere, MA .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2005, 51 (01) :30-44
[6]   Quality-based competition, profitability, and variable costs [J].
Chambers, Chester ;
Kouvelis, Panos ;
Semple, John .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2006, 52 (12) :1884-1895
[7]   Quality Improvement Incentives and Product Recall Cost Sharing Contracts [J].
Chao, Gary H. ;
Iravani, Seyed M. R. ;
Savaskan, R. Canan .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2009, 55 (07) :1122-1138
[8]   PRICE-COMPETITION IN A CHANNEL STRUCTURE WITH A COMMON RETAILER [J].
CHOI, SC .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 1991, 10 (04) :271-296
[9]   Price competition in a duopoly common retailer channel [J].
Choi, SC .
JOURNAL OF RETAILING, 1996, 72 (02) :117-134
[10]   Fairness and channel coordination [J].
Cui, Tony Haitao ;
Raju, Jagmohan S. ;
Zhang, Z. John .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2007, 53 (08) :1303-1314