Pedagogical considerations for the teaching of evaluation

被引:20
作者
LaVelle, John M. [1 ]
Lovato, Chris [2 ]
Stephenson, Clayton L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Univ British Columbia, Sch Populat & Publ Hlth, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] Univ Southern Calif, Dept Psychol, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
关键词
Evaluation; Evaluator education; Evaluation education; Pedagogy; Teaching; PROGRAM-EVALUATION; EVALUATION CAPACITY; SERVICE; GENERATION; STUDENTS; BENEFITS; MEMORY; SKILLS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101786
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Pedagogy and andragogy refer to the philosophical and empirical assumptions that instructors make about what and how people learn. These assumptions guide much of the subsequent instructional design process, including learning objectives, learning experiences, assessment techniques, and more. Most of the existing literature in evaluator education is descriptive in nature, and there has been limited attention to research on pedagogy specific to evaluation or identification of effective practices for teaching evaluation. As a result, we know very little about the theoretical or practical pedagogy of evaluation. As a first step in understanding this pedagogy, this article first synthesizes relevant concepts, principles of learning, and models of instructional design principles of learning developed in the field of education. The authors then offer case examples of how these ideas, principles, models, and pedagogies apply to five evaluation-specific courses.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 115 条
[1]   Strategies for Teaching Students to Think Critically: A Meta-Analysis [J].
Abrami, Philip C. ;
Bernard, Robert M. ;
Borokhovski, Eugene ;
Waddington, David I. ;
Wade, C. Anne ;
Persson, Tonje .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2015, 85 (02) :275-314
[2]  
Alkin M.C., 2013, Evaluation Roots: A Wider Perspective of Theorists' Views and Influences
[3]   Using logic models to facilitate comparisons of evaluation theory [J].
Alkin, Marvin C. ;
Vo, Anne T. ;
Hansen, Mark .
EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING, 2013, 38 :33-33
[4]  
American Evaluation Association, 2018, AEA EV COMP
[5]  
American Evaluation Association, 2011, STAT CULT COMP EV
[6]  
[Anonymous], EVALUATOR ED BRIDGIN
[7]  
[Anonymous], U BASED EVALUA UNPUB
[8]  
[Anonymous], CANADIAN J PROGRAM E
[9]  
[Anonymous], TEACHING HIGHER ED
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Thought Knowledge: An Introduction to Critical Thinking