Research on Differences between Cylindrical and E-Shaped Dampers for the Bidirectional Seismic Control

被引:11
作者
Gao, Hao [1 ]
Wang, Junjie [1 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Dept Bridge Engn, 1239 Siping Rd, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Quasistatic test; Local fine finite-element model; Gap; Friction coefficient; Direction of ground motion; Predictability; SHAKE-TABLE; PERFORMANCE; DEVICES; SYSTEM; MODEL;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001534
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The similarities and differences between the cylindrical and E-shaped damping devices used in bridge engineering are discussed, considering technical factors such as the configuration pattern, mechanical model, hysteresis capacity, modes of failure, material quantity, and installation requirements. Considering the damping effect, a local fine finite-element model is established to analyze the dynamic response of a typical continuous girder bridge. The displacements of the key points and the shear forces of the key components are both evaluated after taking into account the different earthquake ground motion characteristics and incident angles. The differences between the damping effects of these two devices are quantitatively analyzed. Then, each factor that potentially causes this difference is discussed to realize bidirectional control of vibrations in the seismic design of the bridge structure.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] A passive metallic damper with replaceable steel bar components for earthquake protection of structures
    Aghlara, Reza
    Tahir, Mahmood Md.
    [J]. ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2018, 159 : 185 - 197
  • [2] [Anonymous], B0201 JTGT PEOPL REP
  • [3] [Anonymous], 71 U BIRM
  • [4] [Anonymous], P 15 EUR C EARTHQ EN
  • [5] [Anonymous], COD DES GROUND BAS F
  • [6] [Anonymous], 843 JTT PEOPL REP CH
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2014, SEISM EV RETR EX BUI
  • [8] [Anonymous], P 11 WORLD C EARTHQ
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2018, PEER Ground Motion Database
  • [10] [Anonymous], P 13 WORLD C EARTHQ