A comparison of competing models underlying responses to the Myers-Briggs type indicator

被引:25
作者
Jackson, SL [1 ]
Parker, CP [1 ]
Dipboye, RL [1 ]
机构
[1] NO ILLINOIS UNIV, DE KALB, IL USA
关键词
D O I
10.1177/106907279600400107
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI; Myers & McCaulley, 1985) is the most frequently used personality instrument in business, counseling, and education, but its construct validity remains largely unexplored (National Research Council, 1991). A confirmatory factor analysis was conducted on a sample of 1,030 working adults to provide a competitive test of four alternative models of responses to MBTI items. Although the MBTI model was found to provide the best fit of the alternative models, none of the models provided an optimal fit. This confirmatory factor analysis and a follow-up exploratory factor analysis were used to identify necessary scoring changes and item deletions. Use of the revised scoring scheme would result in a change of the MBTI profile for 28.7% of respondents.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 115
页数:17
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1986, MANUAL HOGAN PERSONA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1989, LISREL 7 USERS REFER
[3]  
APOSTAL R, 1990, PSYCHOL REP, V66, P811
[4]   PRACTICAL ISSUES IN STRUCTURAL MODELING [J].
BENTLER, PM ;
CHOU, CP .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 1987, 16 (01) :78-117
[5]  
BENTLER PM, 1980, PSYCHOL BULL, V88, P588, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
[6]   RECENT ASSESSMENTS OF THE MYERS-BRIGGS TYPE INDICATOR [J].
CARLSON, JG .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 1985, 49 (04) :356-365
[7]   ASSESSMENT OF MYERS-BRIGGS TYPE INDICATOR [J].
CARLYN, M .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 1977, 41 (05) :461-473
[8]  
Comery A., 1983, ACAD PSYCHOL B, V5, P115
[9]  
Cronbach LJ, 1951, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V16, P297
[10]  
DEVITO AJ, 1985, 9 MENTAL MEASUREMENT, P1029