Anaerobic co-digestion of cattle manure and meadow grass: Effect of serial configurations of continuous stirred tank reactors (CSTRs)

被引:23
作者
Feng, Lu [1 ]
Wahid, Radziah [1 ,2 ]
Ward, Alastair J. [1 ]
Moller, Henrik B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Dept Engn, Blichers Alle 20, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
[2] Norwegian Univ Life Sci, Fac Chem Biotechnol & Food Sci, POB 5003, N-1432 As, Norway
关键词
Bio-methane; Serial CSTRs; Meadow grass; Thermophilic; Cattle manure; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; METHANE PRODUCTIVITY; WASTE; OPTIMIZATION; SLUDGE; SCALE; STRAW;
D O I
10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2017.05.002
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
In this study, anaerobic co-digestion of cattle manure (CM) and meadow grass (MG) with serial configurations of continuous stirred tank reactors (CSTRs) was investigated. Four laboratory-scale CSTRs were operated at thermophilic condition (55 degrees C), of which two CSTRs were connected serially with equal working volumes while the remaining two CSTRs were operated as single CSTRs as controls. Improvements on bio-methane yield, methane contents and solids reduction were observed with serial CSTR configurations. The results showed that co-digestion with 5% (w/w) MG with serial configurations of CSTRs produced 24% more bio-methane compared with single reactor, with the total hydraulic retention time (HRT) being the same. The volatile fatty acids (VFA) concentration was found higher in the 1st reactor, but was reduced by 40-50% in the 2nd reactor. The improved bio-methane yield with serial CSTR configuration with 100% CM was 8%, indicating that the serial CSTRs process is superior in a co-digestion set up with addition of MG. (C) 2017 IAgrE. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 11
页数:11
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Total solids content drives high solid anaerobic digestion via mass transfer limitation
    Abbassi-Guendouz, Amel
    Brockmann, Doris
    Trably, Eric
    Dumas, Claire
    Delgenes, Jean-Philippe
    Steyer, Jean-Philippe
    Escudie, Renaud
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 111 : 55 - 61
  • [2] AHRING BK, 1995, APPL MICROBIOL BIOT, V43, P559, DOI 10.1007/BF00218466
  • [3] A Review on Optimization Production and Upgrading Biogas Through CO2 Removal Using Various Techniques
    Andriani, Dian
    Wresta, Arini
    Atmaja, Tinton Dwi
    Saepudin, Aep
    [J]. APPLIED BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2014, 172 (04) : 1909 - 1928
  • [4] ANGELIDAKI I, 1993, APPL MICROBIOL BIOT, V38, P560
  • [5] Assessment of the anaerobic biodegradability of macropollutants
    Angelidaki I.
    Sanders W.
    [J]. Re/Views in Environmental Science & Bio/Technology, 2004, 3 (2) : 117 - 129
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2005, Standard methods for the examination of water and waste- water
  • [7] Optimization of biogas production from waste activated sludge through serial digestion
    Athanasoulia, E.
    Melidis, P.
    Aivasidis, A.
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2012, 47 : 147 - 151
  • [8] Estimation of Hydrolysis Parameters in Full-Scale Anerobic Digesters
    Batstone, D. J.
    Tait, S.
    Starrenburg, D.
    [J]. BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING, 2009, 102 (05) : 1513 - 1520
  • [9] Serial CSTR digester configuration for improving biogas production from manure
    Boe, Kanokwan
    Angelidaki, Irini
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2009, 43 (01) : 166 - 172
  • [10] CURTIS J, 2006, BIOENERGY OPPORTUNIT