Governing the interplay of inter-organizational relationship mechanisms in open innovation projects across ecosystems

被引:21
作者
Aagaard, Annabeth [1 ]
Rezac, Fabien [1 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Dept Business Dev & Technol, Birk Centerpark 15, DK-7400 Herning, Denmark
关键词
Open innovation; Project-level; Business; -to; -business; Inter-organizational governance; Interplay; Ecosystems; OUTBOUND OPEN INNOVATION; FIRMS OPEN INNOVATION; CONTRACTUAL GOVERNANCE; KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER; FORMAL CONTRACTS; MEDIATING ROLE; CO-CREATION; TRUST; PERFORMANCE; OPPORTUNISM;
D O I
10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.06.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
More and more self-interested businesses are organizing themselves in interdependent, non-hierarchically controlled networks to jointly create superior value by engaging in open innovation projects. In aligning the heterogeneous actors toward a focal value proposition, it is crucial for the orchestrators of such arrangements to manage their inter-organizational relationships by navigating the interplay of contractual and relational governance mechanisms. Despite the relevance of how contracts and relational governance co-evolve, knowledge on the interaction of contracts and relational governance in specific contexts is still missing. Through a multiplecase study of ten multinational ecosystem orchestrators, we explore how large multinational orchestrators govern the interplay inter-organizational relationship mechanisms in open innovation projects across ecosystems. Based on our findings, we propose a five-dimensional, sequential model of governing the interplay of interorganizational relationship mechanisms in open innovation projects across ecosystems and discuss our contributions in the context of the current literature.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 146
页数:16
相关论文
共 179 条
[1]   Locus of Uncertainty and the Relationship Between Contractual and Relational Governance in Cross-Border Interfirm Relationships [J].
Abdi, Majid ;
Aulakh, Preet S. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2017, 43 (03) :771-803
[2]   Do country-level institutional frameworks and interfirm governance arrangements substitute or complement in international business relationships? [J].
Abdi, Majid ;
Aulakh, Preet S. .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 2012, 43 (05) :477-497
[3]  
Adner R, 2006, HARVARD BUS REV, V84, P98
[4]   Ecosystem as Structure: An Actionable Construct for Strategy [J].
Adner, Ron .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2017, 43 (01) :39-58
[5]   Inter-organizational relationships involving SMEs: A bibliographic investigation into the state of the art [J].
Agostini, Lara ;
Nosella, Anna .
LONG RANGE PLANNING, 2019, 52 (01) :1-31
[6]   Antecedents and consequences of unlearning in new product development teams [J].
Akgün, AE ;
Lynn, GS ;
Byrne, JC .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2006, 23 (01) :73-88
[7]   From ego-systems to open innovation ecosystems: A process model of inter-firm openness [J].
Alam, Muhammad Aftab ;
Rooney, David ;
Taylor, Murray .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2022, 39 (02) :177-201
[8]   Measuring Inter-Firm Openness in Innovation Ecosystems [J].
Alam, Muhammad Aftab ;
Rooney, David ;
Taylor, Murray .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2022, 138 :436-456
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2011, AC MAN 2011 ANN M W
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1985, Naturalistic Inquiry, DOI DOI 10.1002/EV.1427