Age, knowledge, preferences, and risk tolerance for invasive cardiac care

被引:18
作者
Nanna, Michael G. [1 ]
Peterson, Eric D. [1 ]
Wu, Angie [1 ]
Harding, Tina [1 ]
Galanos, Anthony N. [1 ]
Wruck, Lisa [1 ]
Alexander, Karen P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Clin Res Inst, Durham, NC USA
关键词
ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; AMERICAN-HEART-ASSOCIATION; ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SCIENTIFIC STATEMENT; DECISION-MAKING; OLDER-ADULTS; CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY; CARDIOVASCULAR CARE; ELDERLY-PATIENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ahj.2019.09.008
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background/objectives The extent to which individual knowledge, preferences, and priorities explain lower use of invasive cardiac care among older vs. younger adults presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is unknown. We directly surveyed a group of patients to ascertain their preferences and priorities for invasive cardiovascular care. Design We performed a prospective cohort study of adults hospitalized with ACS. We surveyed participants regarding their knowledge, preferences, goals, and concerns for cardiac care, as well as their risk tolerance for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Setting Single academic medical center. Participants Six hundred twenty-eight participants (373 <75 years old; 255 >= 75 years old). Measurements We compared baseline characteristics, knowledge, priorities, and risk tolerance for care across age strata. We also assessed pairwise differences with 95% confidence intervals (CI) between age groups for key variables of interest. Results Compared with younger patients, older participants had less knowledge of invasive care; were less willing to consider cardiac catheterization (difference between 75-84 and< 65 years old: -7.8%, 95% CI: -14.4%,-1.3%; for >= 85 vs. <65: -15.7%, 95% CI: -29.8%,-1.6%), percutaneous coronary intervention (difference between 75-84 and 65 years old: -12.8%, 95% CI: -20.8%,-4.8%; for >= 85 vs. <65: -24.8%, 95% CI: -41.2%, >= 8.5%), and CABG (difference between 75-84 and< 65 years old: -19.0%, 95% CI: -28.2%,-9.9%; for >= 85 vs. <65: -39.1%, 95% CI: -56.0%,-22.2%); and were more risk averse for CABG surgery (p < .001), albeit with substantial inter-individual variability and individual outliers. Many patients who stated they were not initially willing to undergo an invasive cardiovascular procedure actually ended up undergoing the procedure (49% for cardiac catheterization and 22% for PCI or CABG). Conclusion Age influences treatment goals and willingness to consider invasive cardiac care, as well as risk tolerance for CABG. Individuals' willingness to undergo invasive cardiovascular procedures loosely corresponds with whether that procedure is performed after discussion with the care team.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 108
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Acute coronary care in the elderly, Part I Non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndromes - A scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association council on clinical cardiology - In collaboration with the society of geriatric cardiology
    Alexander, Karen P.
    Newby, Kristin
    Cannon, Christopher P.
    Armstrong, Paul W.
    Gibler, W. Brian
    Rich, Michael W.
    Van de Werf, Frans
    White, Harvey D.
    Weaver, W. Douglas
    Naylor, Mary D.
    Gore, Joel M.
    Krumholz, Harlan M.
    Ohman, E. Magnus
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2007, 115 (19) : 2549 - 2569
  • [2] Acute coronary care in the elderly, Part II - ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction - A scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association council on clinical cardiology - In collaboration with the Society of Geriatric Cardiology
    Alexander, Karen P.
    Newby, L. Kristin
    Armstrong, Paul W.
    Cannon, Christopher P.
    Gibler, W. Brian
    Rich, Michael W.
    Van de Werf, Frans
    White, Harvey D.
    Weaver, W. Douglas
    Naylor, Mary D.
    Gore, Joel M.
    Krumholz, Harlan M.
    Ohman, E. Magnus
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2007, 115 (19) : 2570 - 2589
  • [3] Top 10 List for the Cardiovascular Care of Older Adults
    Alexander, Karen P.
    Rich, Michael W.
    Forman, Daniel E.
    Wenger, Nanette K.
    Dodson, John A.
    Alpert, Joseph S.
    Kirkpatrick, James N.
    Maurer, Mathew S.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 129 (09) : 901 - 902
  • [4] Amsterdam EA, 2014, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V64, P2713, DOI [10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.016, 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017, 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000134, 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.10.011]
  • [5] Effect of an invasive strategy on in-hospital outcome in elderly patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction
    Bauer, Timm
    Koeth, Oliver
    Juenger, Claus
    Heer, Tobias
    Wienbergen, Harm
    Gitt, Anselm
    Zahn, Ralf
    Senges, Jochen
    Zeymer, Uwe
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2007, 28 (23) : 2873 - 2878
  • [6] Age, Loss Minimization, and the Role of Probability for Decision-Making
    Best, Ryan
    Freund, Alexandra M.
    [J]. GERONTOLOGY, 2018, 64 (05) : 475 - 484
  • [7] Feasibility of Implementing Patient Priorities Care for Older Adults with Multiple Chronic Conditions
    Blaum, Caroline S.
    Rosen, Jonathan
    Naik, Aanand D.
    Smith, Cynthia D.
    Dindo, Lilian
    Vo, Lauren
    Hernandez-Bigos, Kizzy
    Esterson, Jessica
    Geda, Mary
    Ferris, Rosie
    Costello, Darce
    Acampora, Denise
    Meehan, Thomas
    Tinetti, Mary E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2018, 66 (10) : 2009 - 2016
  • [8] Trends in outcomes among older patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Chin, Chee Tang
    Wang, Tracy Y.
    Chen, Anita Y.
    Mathews, Robin
    Alexander, Karen P.
    Roe, Matthew T.
    Peterson, Eric D.
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2014, 167 (01) : 36 - +
  • [9] Dai XM, 2016, J GERIATR CARDIOL, V13, P101, DOI 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2016.02.012
  • [10] PREPARED Study: A Study of Shared Decision-Making for Coronary Artery Disease
    Doll, Jacob A.
    Jones, W. Schuyler
    Lokhnygina, Yuliya
    Culpepper, Sara
    Parks, Robin L.
    Calhoun, Christy
    Au, David H.
    Patel, Manesh R.
    [J]. CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES, 2019, 12 (02):