A close or positive margin after mastectomy is not an indication for chest wall irradiation except in women aged fifty or younger

被引:54
作者
Freedman, GM
Fowble, BL
Hanlon, AL
Myint, MA
Hoffman, JP
Sigurdson, ER
Eisenberg, BL
Goldstein, LJ
Fein, DA
机构
[1] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
[2] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
[3] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Dept Surg Oncol, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
[4] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 1998年 / 41卷 / 03期
关键词
breast cancer; mastectomy; margins; postmastectomy radiation; young women;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(98)00103-5
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: Indications for postmastectomy radiation include primary tumor size greater than or equal to 5 cm and/or greater than or equal to 4 positive axillary nodes. In clinical practice, patients with a close or positive margin after mastectomy are also often treated with postmastectomy radiation. However, there is little data regarding the risk of a chest wall recurrence in patients with close or positive margins who otherwise would be considered low risk (tumor size <5 cm and/or 0-3 positive nodes). To address this issue, we assessed the risk of a chest wall recurrence in women with Stage I-II breast canter who underwent mastectomy and were found to have primary tumor size <5 cm and 0-3 positive nodes with a close or positive deep margin. Methods and Materials: The pathologic reports from 789 patients treated by mastectomy between 1985 and 1994 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Of these, 136 (17%) had tumor within 1 cm of the deep resection margin. The study population consists of 34 of these patients with close or positive margins whose primary tumor size was <5 cm with 0-3 positive axillary nodes and who received no postoperative radiation. The median age was 43 years (range 29-76). Of these, 44% had T1 tumors and 56% T2 tumors. Pathologic axillary nodal status was negative in 65% and positive in 35%. The median number of positive nodes was 1. The deep margin was positive in 2 patients, less than or equal to 2 mm in 17 patients, 2.1-4 mm in 7 patients and 4.1-6 mm in 8 patients. Of the 34 patients, 67% received adjuvant chemotherapy +/- tamoxifen and 21% received tamoxifen alone. The median follow-up was 59 months (range 7-143). Results: There were 5 chest wall recurrences at a median interval of 26 months (range 7-127). One was an isolated first failure, one occurred concurrent with an axillary recurrence, and three were associated with distant metastases. The 5- and 8-year cumulative incidences of a chest wall recurrence were 9% and 18%. Patient age correlated with the cumulative incidence of chest wall recurrence at 8 years; age less than or equal to 50 years had a rate of 28% vs. 0% for age >50 (p = 0.04). There was no correlation with chest wall failure and number of positive nodes, ER status, lymphovascular invasion, location of primary, grade, family history, or type of tumor close to the margin. Of 5 chest wall failures, 4 were in patients who had received adjuvant systemic chemotherapy +/- tamoxifen. Chest wall failures occurred in 1 patient with a positive deep margin, 3 patients with margins within 2 mm, and 1 patient with a margin of 5 mm. The estimated cumulative incidence probability of chest wall recurrence at 8 years by margin proximity was 24% less than or equal to 2 mm vs. 7% 2.1-6 mm (p = 0.36), and by clinical size 24% for T2 tumors vs. 7% for T1 (p = 0.98). Conclusions: A close or positive margin is uncommon (less than or equal to 5%) after mastectomy in patients with tumor size <5 cm and 0-3 positive axillary nodes but, when present, it appears to be in a younger patient population. The subgroup of patients aged 50 or younger with clinical T1-T2 tumor size and 0-3 positive nodes who have a close (less than or equal to 5 mm) or positive mastectomy margin are at high risk (28% at 8 years) for chest wall recurrence regardless of adjuvant systemic therapy and, therefore, should be considered for postmastectomy radiation. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:599 / 605
页数:7
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] ABE O, 1995, NEW ENGL J MED, V333, P1444
  • [2] ROLE OF CIRCUMFERENTIAL MARGIN INVOLVEMENT IN THE LOCAL RECURRENCE OF RECTAL-CANCER
    ADAM, IJ
    MOHAMDEE, MO
    MARTIN, IG
    SCOTT, N
    FINAN, PJ
    JOHNSTON, D
    DIXON, MF
    QUIRKE, P
    [J]. LANCET, 1994, 344 (8924) : 707 - 711
  • [3] AHLBORN TN, 1988, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V166, P523
  • [4] ALLEN H, 1981, ADJUVANT THERAPY CAN, V3, P453
  • [5] MULTIVARIATE-ANALYSIS OF FACTORS PREDICTING LOCAL RELAPSE AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY - POSSIBLE INDICATIONS FOR POSTOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY
    ANSCHER, MS
    PROSNITZ, LR
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1991, 21 (04): : 941 - 947
  • [6] ARMITAGE P, 1973, STATISTICAL METHODS, P135
  • [7] ARRIAGADA R, 1995, J CLIN ONCOL, V13, P2689
  • [8] COMPARISON OF MODIFIED RADICAL MASTECTOMY TO RADICAL MASTECTOMY IN THE TREATMENT OF OPERABLE BREAST-CANCER
    BAKER, RR
    MONTAGUE, ACW
    CHILDS, NJ
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1979, 189 (05) : 553 - 559
  • [9] THE CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE OF PATHOLOGICAL FINDINGS IN SURGICALLY RESECTED MARGINS OF THE PRIMARY TUMOR IN HEAD AND NECK-CARCINOMA
    CHEN, TY
    EMRICH, LJ
    DRISCOLL, DL
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1987, 13 (06): : 833 - 837
  • [10] Chung M, 1996, CANCER, V77, P97, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960101)77:1<97::AID-CNCR16>3.0.CO