A Comparison of the Quick-SOFA and Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Criteria for the Diagnosis of Sepsis and Prediction of Mortality A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:186
作者
Serafim, Rodrigo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gomes, Jose Andrade [4 ]
Salluh, Jorge [1 ,3 ]
Povoa, Pedro [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Inst DOr Pesquisa & Ensino, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Hosp Copa DOr, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Programa Posgrad Med Interna, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[4] Hosp Luz Lisboa, Unidade Cuidados Intens, Lisbon, Portugal
[5] Hosp Sao Francisco Xavier, Ctr Hosp Lisboa Ocidental, Unidade Cuidados Intens Polivalente, Estr Forte Alto Duque, P-1449005 Lisbon, Portugal
[6] Univ Nova Lisboa, CEDOC, NOVA Med Sch, Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
prediction of mortality; qSOFA; sepsis diagnosis; SIRS criteria; INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS DEFINITIONS; ORGAN FAILURE ASSESSMENT; IN-HOSPITAL MORTALITY; SEPTIC SHOCK; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT; PROGNOSTIC ACCURACY; CLINICAL-CRITERIA; SIRS; PROGRESS; SCORES;
D O I
10.1016/j.chest.2017.12.015
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Several studies were published to validate the quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA), namely in comparison with the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis with the aim of comparing the qSOFA and SIRS in patients outside the ICU. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, and the Web of Science database from February 23, 2016 until June 30, 2017 to identify full-text English-language studies published after the Sepsis-3 publication comparing the qSOFA and SIRS and their sensitivity or specificity in diagnosing sepsis, as well as hospital and ICU length of stay and hospital mortality. Data extraction from the selected studies followed the recommendations of the Meta-analyses of Observational Studies in Epidemiology group and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. RESULTS: From 4,022 citations, 10 studies met the inclusion criteria. Pooling all the studies, a total of 229,480 patients were evaluated. The meta-analysis of sensitivity for the diagnosis of sepsis comparing the qSOFA and SIRS was in favor of SIRS (risk ratio [RR], 1.32; 95% CI, 0.40-2.24; P < .0001; I-2 = 100%). One study described the specificity for the diagnosis of infection comparing SIRS (84.4%; 95% CI, 76.2-90.6) with the qSOFA (97.3%; 95% CI < 92.1-99.4); the qSOFA demonstrated better specificity. The meta-analysis of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of six studies comparing the qSOFA and SIRS favored the qSOFA (RR, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.01-0.05; P =.002; I-2 = 48%) as a predictor of inhospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The SIRS was significantly superior to the qSOFA for sepsis diagnosis, and the qSOFA was slightly better than the SIRS in predicting hospital mortality. The association of both criteria could provide a better model to initiate or escalate therapy in patients with sepsis.
引用
收藏
页码:646 / 655
页数:10
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   SEPSIS CLINICAL CRITERIA IN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT PATIENTS ADMITTED TO AN INTENSIVE CARE UNIT: AN EXTERNAL VALIDATION STUDY OF QUICK SEQUENTIAL ORGAN FAILURE ASSESSMENT [J].
April, Michael D. ;
Aguirre, Jose ;
Tannenbaum, Lloyd I. ;
Moore, Tyler ;
Pingree, Alexander ;
Thaxton, Robert E. ;
Sessions, Daniel J. ;
Lantry, James H. .
JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2017, 52 (05) :622-631
[2]   Poor performance of quick-SOFA (qSOFA) score in predicting severe sepsis and mortality - a prospective study of patients admitted with infection to the emergency department [J].
Askim, Asa ;
Moser, Florentin ;
Gustad, Lise T. ;
Stene, Helga ;
Gundersen, Maren ;
Asvold, Bjorn Olav ;
Dale, Jostein ;
Bjornsen, Lars Petter ;
Damas, Jan Kristian ;
Solligard, Erik .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA RESUSCITATION & EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2017, 25
[3]   DEFINITIONS FOR SEPSIS AND ORGAN FAILURE AND GUIDELINES FOR THE USE OF INNOVATIVE THERAPIES IN SEPSIS [J].
BONE, RC ;
BALK, RA ;
CERRA, FB ;
DELLINGER, RP ;
FEIN, AM ;
KNAUS, WA ;
SCHEIN, RMH ;
SIBBALD, WJ .
CHEST, 1992, 101 (06) :1644-1655
[4]   Predictors of Patients Who Present to the Emergency Department With Sepsis and Progress to Septic Shock Between 4 and 48 Hours of Emergency Department Arrival [J].
Capp, Roberta ;
Horton, Cheryl Lynn ;
Takhar, Sukhjit S. ;
Ginde, Adit A. ;
Peak, David A. ;
Zane, Richard ;
Marill, Keith A. .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2015, 43 (05) :983-988
[5]  
Carneiro António Henriques, 2017, Rev. bras. ter. intensiva, V29, P4, DOI 10.5935/0103-507X.20170002
[6]   Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment; Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, and Early Warning Scores for Detecting Clinical Deterioration in Infected Patients outside the Intensive Care Unit [J].
Churpek, Matthew M. ;
Snyder, Ashley ;
Han, Xuan ;
Sokol, Sarah ;
Pettit, Natasha ;
Howell, Michael D. ;
Edelson, Dana P. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2017, 195 (07) :906-911
[7]   Change Is Not Necessarily Progress: Revision of the Sepsis Definition Should Be Based on New Scientific Insights [J].
Cortes-Poch, Irene ;
Hartog, Christiane S. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2016, 194 (01) :16-18
[8]  
Daly LE, 1998, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V147, P783
[9]   Application of the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis (Sepsis-3) Classification: a retrospective population-based cohort study [J].
Donnelly, John P. ;
Safford, Monika M. ;
Shapiro, Nathan I. ;
Baddley, John W. ;
Wang, Henry E. .
LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2017, 17 (06) :661-670
[10]   qSOFA Has Poor Sensitivity for Prehospital Identification of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock [J].
Dorsett, Maia ;
Kroll, Melissa ;
Smith, Clark S. ;
Asaro, Phillip ;
Liang, Stephen Y. ;
Moy, Hawnwan P. .
PREHOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE, 2017, 21 (04) :489-497