Prosocial Behavior Can Moderate the Relationship Between Rumination and Mindfulness

被引:3
作者
Meng, Yao [1 ]
Meng, Gang [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, Dept Psychol, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Zibo Vocat Inst, Sch Based Mental Hlth Ctr, Zibo, Peoples R China
关键词
rumination; mindfulness; prosocial behavior; moderating effect; mental health; ATTENTION; INDIVIDUALS; DISTRACTION; MECHANISMS; DEPRESSION; RESPONSES; SYMPTOMS; THINKING; CARE;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00289
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective Rumination, which is a coping style to distress, has become a common mode of thinking about mental illnesses such as depression and anxiety. Improving mindfulness is an effective way to help people cope with rumination. Individuals who had higher prosocial behaviors reported a high level of mindfulness. This study aimed to explore whether prosocial behavior helps individuals with high-level rumination improve their mindfulness, and explain the reason why prosocial behavior can influence the relationship between mindfulness and rumination. Methods Introducing prosocial behavior situations, the first study chose 51 high-level rumination and 53 low-level rumination participants and measured the influence of prosocial behavior on mindful attention awareness in the present moment. In the second study, a questionnaire was conducted among 261 participants to explore the moderating effect of prosocial behavior between rumination and mindfulness. Results In individuals with high-level rumination, Delta MAAS (mindful attention awareness scale) (posttest-baseline) scores in the prosocial behavior condition were significantly higher compared to those in the control condition (p=0.003). Meanwhile, prosocial behavior played a moderating effect between reflective pondering of rumination and mindfulness (R-2 (=) 0.03, p=0.004). Conclusions Encouraging prosocial behavior is an effective way to improve mindfulness in highly ruminative individuals.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review [J].
Aldao, Amelia ;
Nolen-Hoeksema, Susan ;
Schweizer, Susanne .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2010, 30 (02) :217-237
[2]   Rumination and Mindlessness Processes: Trajectories of Change in a 42-Day Mindfulness-Based Intervention [J].
Andreotti, Eva ;
Congard, Anne ;
Le Vigouroux, Sarah ;
Dauvier, Bruno ;
Illy, Johan ;
Poinsot, Rollon ;
Antoine, Pascal .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2018, 32 (02) :127-139
[3]   Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness [J].
Baer, RA ;
Smith, GT ;
Hopkins, J ;
Krietemeyer, J ;
Toney, L .
ASSESSMENT, 2006, 13 (01) :27-45
[4]   Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention: A conceptual and empirical review [J].
Baer, RA .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2003, 10 (02) :125-143
[5]   Assessing Mindfulness in Multiple Contexts: a Comment on Christopher, Woodrich, and Tiernan (2014) [J].
Baer, Ruth A. .
MINDFULNESS, 2015, 6 (03) :687-692
[6]   Individual differences in anterior EEG asymmetry between high and low defensive individuals during a rumination/distraction task [J].
Blackhart, GC ;
Kline, JP .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2005, 39 (02) :427-437
[8]   Could Mindfulness Decrease Anger, Hostility, and Aggression by Decreasing Rumination? [J].
Borders, Ashley ;
Earleywine, Mitch ;
Jajodia, Archana .
AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOR, 2010, 36 (01) :28-44
[9]   Memory Specificity and Mindfulness Jointly Moderate the Effect of Reflective Pondering on Depressive Symptoms in Individuals With a History of Recurrent Depression [J].
Brennan, Kate ;
Barnhofer, Thorsten ;
Crane, Catherine ;
Duggan, Danielle ;
Williams, J. Mark G. .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 124 (02) :246-255
[10]   Out of the Armchair and Into the Streets: Measuring Mindfulness Advances Knowledge and Improves Interventions: Reply to Grossman (2011) [J].
Brown, Kirk Warren ;
Ryan, Richard M. ;
Loverich, Tamara M. ;
Biegel, Gina M. ;
West, Angela Marie .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2011, 23 (04) :1041-1046