Seeing the Other Side: Reducing Political Partisanship via Self-Affirmation in the 2008 Presidential Election

被引:32
作者
Binning, Kevin R.
Sherman, David K. [2 ]
Cohen, Geoffrey L. [1 ,3 ]
Heitland, Kirsten [4 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Educ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Dept Psychol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] Univ Bielefeld, Grp Focused Enm, Grad Sch, Bielefeld, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1530-2415.2010.01210.x
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
The 2008 presidential election brought the partisan divide between U. S. Republicans and Democrats to the forefront. In such contested situations, people who identify with the parties and their candidates experience pressure to adhere to their group's core beliefs and behaviors. This research hypothesized that providing individuals a chance to affirm their self-integrity would relieve some of this pressure and facilitate greater openness to the opposition. In the 2 days prior to the 2008 election, Democrats (N = 50) and Republicans (N = 60) who affirmed their self-integrity by writing about important personal values (versus those who did not self-affirm) were less driven by partisan preferences in their evaluations of Barack Obama's debate performance, more favorable to opposition candidates, and more generally open to alternative viewpoints. Additionally, 10 days after the election, affirmed Republicans thought Obama would make a better president than did nonaffirmed Republicans. Discussion centers on how motivational factors can exacerbate-and attenuate-the divide between "red" and "blue" America.
引用
收藏
页码:276 / 292
页数:17
相关论文
共 38 条
[21]   Concern for the in-group and opposition to affirmative action [J].
Lowery, Brian S. ;
Unzueta, Miguel M. ;
Knowles, Eric D. ;
Goff, Phillip Atiba .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 90 (06) :961-974
[22]   THE BLACK SHEEP EFFECT - EXTREMITY OF JUDGMENTS TOWARDS INGROUP MEMBERS AS A FUNCTION OF GROUP IDENTIFICATION [J].
MARQUES, JM ;
YZERBYT, VY ;
LEYENS, JP .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 18 (01) :1-16
[23]   Experimental manipulations of self-affirmation: A systematic review [J].
McQueen, Amy ;
Klein, William M. P. .
SELF AND IDENTITY, 2006, 5 (04) :289-354
[24]   GENDER GAPS - WHO NEEDS TO BE EXPLAINED [J].
MILLER, DT ;
TAYLOR, B ;
BUCK, ML .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 61 (01) :5-12
[25]  
Reeson G. C., 2008, OBAMA REFERENDUM
[26]   Self-affirmation and mortality salience: Affirming values reduces worldview defense and death-thought accessibility [J].
Schmeichel, BJ ;
Martens, A .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2005, 31 (05) :658-667
[27]   SELF-INTEREST VS SYMBOLIC POLITICS IN POLICY ATTITUDES AND PRESIDENTIAL VOTING [J].
SEARS, DO ;
LAU, RR ;
TYLER, TR ;
ALLEN, HM .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1980, 74 (03) :670-684
[28]   A house divided? The psychology of red and blue America [J].
Seyle, D. Conor ;
Newman, Matthew L. .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2006, 61 (06) :571-580
[29]   The group as a resource: Reducing biased attributions for group success and failure via group affirmation [J].
Sherman, David K. ;
Kinias, Zoe ;
Major, Brenda ;
Kim, Heejung S. ;
Prenovost, Mary .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2007, 33 (08) :1100-1112
[30]   The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory [J].
Sherman, David K. ;
Cohen, Geoffrey L. .
ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 38, 2006, 38 :183-242