Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Is Associated with Decreased Clinically Relevant Pancreatic Fistulas: a Propensity-Matched Analysis

被引:62
作者
Cai, Jianpeng [1 ]
Ramanathan, Rajesh [2 ]
Zenati, Mazen S. [3 ]
Al Abbas, Amr [2 ]
Hogg, Melissa E. [4 ]
Zeh, Herbert J. [5 ]
Zureikat, Amer H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Hepatobiliary & Pancreat Surg, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Surg, Med Ctr, 5150 Ctr Ave,Suite 421, Pittsburgh, PA 15232 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Surg & Epidemiol, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] NorthShore Hosp, Dept Surg, Chicago, IL USA
[5] Univ Texas Southwestern, Dept Surg, Dallas, TX USA
关键词
Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Minimally invasive; Whipple; Pancreatic leak; Pancreas fistula; INTERNATIONAL STUDY-GROUP; RISK; OUTCOMES; RECURRENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s11605-019-04274-1
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is a major complication that adversely affects recovery. The robotic approach may decrease the incidence of this complication. This propensity-matched analysis evaluates the impact of robotic PD (RPD) on CR-POPF. Methods Patients undergoing PD after the learning curve at a high-volume academic medical center were reviewed. CR-POPF outcomes after open PD (OPD) and RPD were compared. Logistic regression and propensity score matching (PSM) were used to define the independent effect of RPD on CR-POPF. Results Of 865 PDs performed over the study period, 405 (46.8%) were OPD and 460 (53.2%) were RPD. RPD was associated with a similar overall POPF rate, but a lower incidence of CR-POPF (6.7% vs. 15.8%, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, RPD was an independent predictor of lower CR-POPF (OR 0.278, p < 0.001). Following propensity matching, RPD continued to be protective against the occurrence of CR-POPF (coefficient = - 0.113, p = 0.001). Conclusions This is the largest single-center PSM analysis to evaluate the impact of robotic approach on pancreatoduodenectomy and suggests that RPD can minimize the clinical impact of pancreatic leaks after PD.
引用
收藏
页码:1111 / 1118
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   A Tutorial and Case Study in Propensity Score Analysis: An Application to Estimating the Effect of In-Hospital Smoking Cessation Counseling on Mortality [J].
Austin, Peter C. .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 2011, 46 (01) :119-151
[2]   Retrospective Comparison of Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Periampullary Neoplasms [J].
Bao, Philip Q. ;
Mazirka, Pavel O. ;
Watkins, Kevin T. .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2014, 18 (04) :682-689
[3]   The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After [J].
Bassi, Claudio ;
Marchegiani, Giovanni ;
Dervenis, Christos ;
Sarr, Micheal ;
Abu Hilal, Mohammad ;
Adham, Mustapha ;
Allen, Peter ;
Andersson, Roland ;
Asbun, Horacio J. ;
Besselink, Marc G. ;
Conlon, Kevin ;
Del Chiaro, Marco ;
Falconi, Massimo ;
Fernandez-Cruz, Laureano ;
Fernandez-Del Castillo, Carlos ;
Fingerhut, Abe ;
Friess, Helmut ;
Gouma, Dirk J. ;
Hackert, Thilo ;
Izbicki, Jakob ;
Lillemoe, Keith D. ;
Neoptolemos, John P. ;
Olah, Attila ;
Schulick, Richard ;
Shrikhande, Shailesh V. ;
Takada, Tadahiro ;
Takaori, Kyoichi ;
Traverso, William ;
Vollmer, Charles ;
Wolfgang, Christopher L. ;
Yeo, Charles J. ;
Salvia, Roberto ;
Buehler, Marcus .
SURGERY, 2017, 161 (03) :584-591
[4]   Feasibility of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy [J].
Boggi, U. ;
Signori, S. ;
De Lio, N. ;
Perrone, V. G. ;
Vistoli, F. ;
Belluomini, M. ;
Cappelli, C. ;
Amorese, G. ;
Mosca, F. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 100 (07) :917-925
[5]   Assessment of Quality Outcomes for Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Identification of the Learning Curve [J].
Boone, Brian A. ;
Zenati, Mazen ;
Hogg, Melissa E. ;
Steve, Jennifer ;
Moser, Arthur James ;
Bartlett, David L. ;
Zeh, Herbert J. ;
Zureikat, Amer H. .
JAMA SURGERY, 2015, 150 (05) :416-422
[6]   Robotic Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Comparative Study at a Single Institution [J].
Buchs, Nicolas Christian ;
Addeo, Pietro ;
Bianco, Francesco Maria ;
Ayloo, Subhashini ;
Benedetti, Enrico ;
Giulianotti, Pier Cristoforo .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 35 (12) :2739-2746
[7]   A Prospectively Validated Clinical Risk Score Accurately Predicts Pancreatic Fistula after Pancreatoduodenectomy [J].
Callery, Mark P. ;
Pratt, Wande B. ;
Kent, Tara S. ;
Chaikof, Elliot L. ;
Vollmer, Charles M., Jr. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2013, 216 (01) :1-14
[8]   Laparoscopic robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy: a case-matched comparison with open resection [J].
Chalikonda, S. ;
Aguilar-Saavedra, J. R. ;
Walsh, R. M. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (09) :2397-2402
[9]  
Dundar HZ, 2018, ANN ITAL CHIR, V89, P315
[10]   Robotic gastrointestinal surgery [J].
Felder, Seth I. ;
Ramanathan, Rajesh ;
Russo, Ashley E. ;
Jimenez-Rodriguez, Rosa Maria ;
Hogg, Melissa E. ;
Zureikat, Amer H. ;
Strong, Vivian E. ;
Zeh, Herbert J. ;
Weiser, Martin R. .
CURRENT PROBLEMS IN SURGERY, 2018, 55 (06) :198-246