Conceptualizing the above ground factors in shale gas: Toward a research agenda on regulatory governance

被引:12
作者
Goldthau, Andreas [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Cent European Univ, Sch Publ Policy, Nador Ut 9, H-1051 Budapest, Hungary
[2] Harvard Univ, John F Kennedy Sch Govt, Belfer Ctr Sci & Int Affairs, Nador Ut 9, H-1051 Budapest, Hungary
关键词
Shale gas; Regulatory governance; Technology transfer; NATURAL-GAS; PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS; POLITICAL-ECONOMY; DECISION-MAKING; LAND-USE; POLICY; FRACKING; FEDERALISM; RISKS; STATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.erss.2016.05.003
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Stalling progress in European, Chinese and Latin American shale has been attributed to difficult geological formations and lacking data. Yet, 'above ground' factors matter in the extractive industries as much as geology. It is policies, regulation and institutional settings that determines the success or failure of a contested, risk bound technology such as fracking. This article suggests that a regulatory governance agenda may offer novel insights into shale gas as a policy phenomenon. The article first provides a critical review of the existing literature on shale gas and identifies the key themes of security, social contestations and socio-economic impact. It then turns to assessing the literature on policy regimes, regulatory competition, regulatory path dependence and regulatory agencies which, it is argued, form essential elements of a research agenda for investigating unconventional gas as a regulatory governance problem. Building on these, the paper sketches focal points of investigations going forward. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 81
页数:9
相关论文
共 156 条
[51]  
Brasier K.J., 2011, Journal of Rural Social Studies, V26, P32
[52]  
Burger Michael., 2013, U PENN LAW REV, V150, P150
[53]   A THEORY OF POLITICAL CONTROL AND AGENCY DISCRETION [J].
CALVERT, RL ;
MCCUBBINS, MD ;
WEINGAST, BR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 1989, 33 (03) :588-611
[54]   FEDERALISM AND CORPORATE LAW - REFLECTIONS UPON DELAWARE [J].
CARY, WL .
YALE LAW JOURNAL, 1974, 83 (04) :663-705
[55]   Emerging Risk Communication Challenges Associated with Shale Gas Development [J].
Clarke, Christopher E. ;
Evensen, Darrick T. N. ;
Jacquet, Jeffrey ;
Stedman, Richard C. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RISK REGULATION, 2012, 3 (03) :424-430
[56]  
Considine T.J., 2010, The economic impacts of the Pennsylvania Marcellus shale natural gas play: an update
[57]   Shale gas policy in the United Kingdom: An argumentative discourse analysis [J].
Cotton, Matthew ;
Rattle, Imogen ;
Van Alstine, James .
ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 73 :427-438
[58]   NUCLEAR-POWER REACTORS - A STUDY IN TECHNOLOGICAL LOCK-IN [J].
COWAN, R .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC HISTORY, 1990, 50 (03) :541-567
[60]   Can Unconventional Gas Be a Game-Changer for India? [J].
Dadwal, Shebonti Ray .
STRATEGIC ANALYSIS, 2012, 36 (02) :247-259