Strong influence of deposition and vertical mixing on secondary organic aerosol concentrations in CMAQ and CAMx

被引:8
|
作者
Shu, Qian [1 ]
Koo, Bonyoung [2 ]
Yarwood, Greg [2 ]
Henderson, Barron H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Engn Sch Sustainable Infrastruct & Environm, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Ramboll Environ, Novato, CA USA
关键词
SOA; Deposition; Vertical mixing; Model bias; Volatility basis set; CMAQ; CAMx; DRY DEPOSITION; MODEL; QUANTIFICATION; EMISSIONS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.10.035
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Differences between two air quality modeling systems reveal important uncertainties in model representations of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) fate. Two commonly applied models (CMAQ: Community Multiscale Air Quality; CAMx: Comprehensive Air Quality Model with extensions) predict very different OA concentrations over the eastern U.S., even when using the same source data for emissions and meteorology and the same SOA modeling approach. Both models include an option to output a detailed accounting of how each model process (e.g., chemistry, deposition, etc.) alters the mass of each modeled species, referred to as process analysis. We therefore perform a detailed diagnostic evaluation to quantify simulated tendencies (Gg/hr) of each modeled process affecting both the total model burden (Gg) of semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOC) in the gas (g) and aerosol (a) phases and the vertical structures to identify causes of concentration differences between the two models. Large differences in deposition (CMAQ: 69.2 Gg/d; 46.5 Gg/d) contribute to significant OA bias in CMAQ relative to daily averaged ambient concentration measurements. CMAQ's larger deposition results from faster daily average deposition velocities (VD) for both SVOC (g) (V-D,V-imq = 2.15 x V-D,V-camx) and aerosols (V-D,V-cmaq = 4.43 x V-d,V-amx). Higher aerosol deposition velocity would be expected to cause similar biases for inert compounds like elemental carbon (EC), but this was not seen. Daytime low-biases in EC were also simulated in CMAQ as expected but were offset by nighttime high-biases. Nighttime high-biases were a result of overly shallow mixing in CMAQ leading to a higher fraction of EC total atmospheric mass in the first layer (CAMx: 5.1-6.4%; CMAQ: 5.6-6.9%). Because of the opposing daytime and nighttime biases, the apparent daily average bias for EC is reduced. For OA, there are two effects of reduced vertical mixing: SOA and SVOC are concentrated near the surface, but SOA yields are reduced near the surface by nighttime enhancement of NOx. These results help to characterize model processes in the context of SOA and provide guidance for model improvement.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 329
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Mixing times of organic molecules within secondary organic aerosol particles: a global planetary boundary layer perspective
    Maclean, Adrian M.
    Butenhoff, Christopher L.
    Grayson, James W.
    Barsanti, Kelley
    Jimenez, Jose L.
    Bertram, Allan K.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2017, 17 (21) : 13037 - 13048
  • [42] Differences of the oxidation process and secondary organic aerosol formation at low and high precursor concentrations
    Chen, Tianzeng
    Liu, Yongchun
    Chu, Biwu
    Liu, Changgeng
    Liu, Jun
    Ge, Yanli
    Ma, Qingxin
    Ma, Jinzhu
    He, Hong
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2019, 79 : 256 - 263
  • [43] Secondary organic aerosol formation from the oxidation of decamethylcyclopentasiloxane at atmospherically relevant OH concentrations
    Charan, Sophia M.
    Huang, Yuanlong
    Buenconsejo, Reina S.
    Li, Qi
    Cocker, David R., III
    Seinfeld, John H.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2022, 22 (02) : 917 - 928
  • [44] Differences of the oxidation process and secondary organic aerosol formation at low and high precursor concentrations
    Tianzeng Chen
    Yongchun Liu
    Biwu Chu
    Changgeng Liu
    Jun Liu
    Yanli Ge
    Qingxin Ma
    Jinzhu Ma
    Hong He
    Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2019, 79 (05) : 256 - 263
  • [45] Predicted secondary organic aerosol concentrations from the oxidation of isoprene in the Eastern United States
    Lane, Timothy E.
    Pandis, Spyros N.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 41 (11) : 3984 - 3990
  • [46] Carbonaceous aerosol in urban and rural European atmospheres: estimation of secondary organic carbon concentrations
    Castro, LM
    Pio, CA
    Harrison, RM
    Smith, DJT
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1999, 33 (17) : 2771 - 2781
  • [47] Influence of local production and vertical transport on the organic aerosol budget over Paris
    Janssen, R. H. H.
    Tsimpidi, A. P.
    Karydis, V. A.
    Pozzer, A.
    Lelieveld, J.
    Crippa, M.
    Prevot, A. S. H.
    Ait-Helal, W.
    Borbon, A.
    Sauvage, S.
    Locoge, N.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2017, 122 (15) : 8276 - 8296
  • [48] Enhancement effect of relative humidity on the formation and regional respiratory deposition of secondary organic aerosol
    Yu, Kuo-Pin
    Lin, Chi-Chi
    Yang, Shang-Chun
    Zhao, Ping
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2011, 191 (1-3) : 94 - 102
  • [49] SECONDARY FORMATION OF ORGANIC AEROSOL IN THE LOS-ANGELES BASIN - A DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS OF ORGANIC AND ELEMENTAL CARBON CONCENTRATIONS
    TURPIN, BJ
    HUNTZICKER, JJ
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT PART A-GENERAL TOPICS, 1991, 25 (02): : 207 - 215
  • [50] Wet deposition in a global size-dependent aerosol transport model 2.: Influence of the scavenging scheme on 210Pb vertical profiles, surface concentrations, and deposition
    Guelle, W
    Balkanski, YJ
    Dibb, JE
    Schulz, M
    Dulac, F
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1998, 103 (D22) : 28875 - 28891