Strong influence of deposition and vertical mixing on secondary organic aerosol concentrations in CMAQ and CAMx

被引:8
|
作者
Shu, Qian [1 ]
Koo, Bonyoung [2 ]
Yarwood, Greg [2 ]
Henderson, Barron H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Engn Sch Sustainable Infrastruct & Environm, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Ramboll Environ, Novato, CA USA
关键词
SOA; Deposition; Vertical mixing; Model bias; Volatility basis set; CMAQ; CAMx; DRY DEPOSITION; MODEL; QUANTIFICATION; EMISSIONS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.10.035
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Differences between two air quality modeling systems reveal important uncertainties in model representations of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) fate. Two commonly applied models (CMAQ: Community Multiscale Air Quality; CAMx: Comprehensive Air Quality Model with extensions) predict very different OA concentrations over the eastern U.S., even when using the same source data for emissions and meteorology and the same SOA modeling approach. Both models include an option to output a detailed accounting of how each model process (e.g., chemistry, deposition, etc.) alters the mass of each modeled species, referred to as process analysis. We therefore perform a detailed diagnostic evaluation to quantify simulated tendencies (Gg/hr) of each modeled process affecting both the total model burden (Gg) of semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOC) in the gas (g) and aerosol (a) phases and the vertical structures to identify causes of concentration differences between the two models. Large differences in deposition (CMAQ: 69.2 Gg/d; 46.5 Gg/d) contribute to significant OA bias in CMAQ relative to daily averaged ambient concentration measurements. CMAQ's larger deposition results from faster daily average deposition velocities (VD) for both SVOC (g) (V-D,V-imq = 2.15 x V-D,V-camx) and aerosols (V-D,V-cmaq = 4.43 x V-d,V-amx). Higher aerosol deposition velocity would be expected to cause similar biases for inert compounds like elemental carbon (EC), but this was not seen. Daytime low-biases in EC were also simulated in CMAQ as expected but were offset by nighttime high-biases. Nighttime high-biases were a result of overly shallow mixing in CMAQ leading to a higher fraction of EC total atmospheric mass in the first layer (CAMx: 5.1-6.4%; CMAQ: 5.6-6.9%). Because of the opposing daytime and nighttime biases, the apparent daily average bias for EC is reduced. For OA, there are two effects of reduced vertical mixing: SOA and SVOC are concentrated near the surface, but SOA yields are reduced near the surface by nighttime enhancement of NOx. These results help to characterize model processes in the context of SOA and provide guidance for model improvement.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 329
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Influence of Aerosol Acidity on the Formation of Secondary Organic Aerosol from Biogenic Precursor Hydrocarbons
    Offenberg, John H.
    Lewandowski, Michael
    Edney, Edward O.
    Kleindienst, Tadeusz E.
    Jaoui, Mohammed
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 43 (20) : 7742 - 7747
  • [32] Effect of chemical aging of monoterpene products on biogenic secondary organic aerosol concentrations
    Dinkelacker, Brian T.
    Pandis, Spyros N.
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 254
  • [33] Effect of chemical aging of monoterpene products on biogenic secondary organic aerosol concentrations
    Dinkelacker, Brian T.
    Pandis, Spyros N.
    Atmospheric Environment, 2021, 254
  • [34] Water uptake by organic aerosol and its influence on gas/particle partitioning of secondary organic aerosol in the United States
    Jathar, Shantanu H.
    Mahmud, Abdullah
    Barsanti, Kelley C.
    Asher, William E.
    Pankow, James F.
    Kleeman, Michael J.
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 129 : 142 - 154
  • [35] Influence of biogenic secondary organic aerosol formation approaches on atmospheric chemistry
    Bonn, B
    Lawrence, MG
    JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY, 2005, 51 (03) : 235 - 270
  • [36] Modeling the influence of alkane molecular structure on secondary organic aerosol formation
    Aumont, Bernard
    Camredon, Marie
    Mouchel-Vallon, Camille
    La, Stephanie
    Ouzebidour, Farida
    Valorso, Richard
    Lee-Taylor, Julia
    Madronich, Sasha
    FARADAY DISCUSSIONS, 2013, 165 : 105 - 122
  • [37] Influence of Biogenic Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation Approaches on Atmospheric Chemistry
    Boris Bonn
    Mark G. Lawrence
    Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry, 2005, 51 : 235 - 270
  • [38] Influence of Candle Emissions on Monoterpene Oxidation Chemistry and Secondary Organic Aerosol
    Wang, Kai
    Rasmussen, Berit Brondum
    Thomsen, Ditte
    Zhang, Yun
    Jensen, Mads Mork
    Kristensen, Kasper
    Hoffmann, Thorsten
    Glasius, Marianne
    Bilde, Merete
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 58 (48) : 21265 - 21274
  • [39] Multiphase Reactions of Hydrocarbons Into an Air Quality Model With CAMx-UNIPAR: Impacts of Humidity and NOx on Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation in the Southern USA
    Jo, Yujin
    Jang, Myoseon
    Madhu, Azad
    Choi, Jiwon
    Park, Jinsoo
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2024, 16 (10)
  • [40] Deposition of secondary organic aerosol in human lung model: Effect of photochemically aged aerosol on human respiratory system
    Oh, Hyeon-Ju
    Chen, Yanfang
    Kim, Hwajin
    ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY, 2023, 265