Rationale for a Novel Attachment System for Implant-Supported Overdentures

被引:2
|
作者
Grobecker-Karl, Tanja [1 ]
Kafitz, Dent Lea [1 ]
Karl, Dent Matthias [1 ]
Karl, Matthias [1 ]
机构
[1] Saarland Univ, Dept Prosthodont, Kirrberger Str 100, D-66421 Homburg, Germany
关键词
IN-VITRO; MANDIBULAR OVERDENTURE; CROWN ATTACHMENTS; TELESCOPIC CROWNS; DENTURE; MIDLINE; LOAD; BALL; BAR;
D O I
10.11607/ijp.6875
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: To quantify the effect of support stiffness on the retention forces of telescopic crowns and to evaluate a prototype attachment system incorporating a nickel-titanium element. Materials and Methods: In the first part of the study, telescopic crowns were fabricated employing standard laboratory procedures. For six combinations of telescopic crowns, the separation force was determined while varying the stiffness of their supporting implants. In the second study part, an in vitro mandibular model with three interforaminal implants was equipped with strain gauges and extensometers. Two prostheses employing either cylindrical telescopic crowns or prototype attachments were fabricated and statically loaded on the model using either the midline or left canine implant or both canine implants for support while strain in the peri-implant area and prosthesis displacement were recorded. Statistical analysis of both study parts was based on pairwise comparisons, with the level of significance set at a = .05. Results: With one exception (P = .161), for each assembly of two telescopic crowns, the separating force was always dependent on the stiffness of the supporting implants. With 3 exceptions out of a total of 14 comparisons for peri-implant strain and prosthesis displacement, the use of the prototype attachments always led to significantly lower mean values compared to the use of cylindrical telescopes (P < .00). Conclusion: The individual retention force of telescopic crowns on implants should be set at a lower level compared to telescopic crowns on natural abutments. Incorporating a nickel-titanium element into attachment systems for implant-supported removable prostheses reduces penimplant strain and may facilitate the use of telescopic crowns. Intl Prosthodont 2022
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 81
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Implant-Supported Overdentures: Current Status and Preclinical Testing of a Novel Attachment System
    Wendler, Frank
    Diehl, Lisa
    Shayanfard, Pejman
    Karl, Matthias
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (03)
  • [2] The notion of implant-supported overdentures
    Schmitt, A
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1998, 79 (01): : 60 - 65
  • [3] Cost and complications associated with implant-supported overdentures with a resilient-attachment system: A retrospective study
    Patodia, Chetan
    Sutton, Alan
    Gozalo, David
    Font, Kerri
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2022, 128 (02): : 181 - 186
  • [4] Implant-supported overdentures: part 1
    Gray, David
    Patel, Jaymit
    BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2021, 231 (02) : 94 - 100
  • [5] Implant-supported overdentures: part 1
    David Gray
    Jaymit Patel
    British Dental Journal, 2021, 231 : 94 - 100
  • [6] Implant-supported overdentures: part 2
    Patel, Jaymit
    Gray, David
    BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2021, 231 (03) : 169 - 175
  • [7] Implant-supported overdentures: part 2
    Jaymit Patel
    David Gray
    British Dental Journal, 2021, 231 : 169 - 175
  • [8] Masticatory function with implant-supported overdentures
    van Kampen, FMC
    van der Bilt, A
    Cune, MS
    Fontijn-Tekamp, FA
    Bosman, F
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2004, 83 (09) : 708 - 711
  • [9] Comparison of retention of two different attachment systems used in implant-supported overdentures
    Dhamodaran, S.
    Ahmed, Shafath
    Nandini, Vidyashree
    Marimuthu, Russia
    Ramadoss, Sethuraman
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2022, 14 : 605 - 610
  • [10] A clinical comparison of prosthetic complications of implant-supported overdentures with different attachment systems
    Karabuda, Cuneyt
    Yaltink, Mehmet
    Bayraktar, Mehmet
    IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2008, 17 (01) : 74 - 81