Dissecting demand response mechanisms: The role of consumption forecasts and personalized offers

被引:4
作者
Benegiamo, Alberto [1 ,2 ]
Loiseau, Patrick [3 ,4 ]
Neglia, Giovanni [2 ]
机构
[1] EURECOM, Campus SophiaTech,450 Route Chappes, F-06410 Biot, France
[2] Inria Sophia Antipolis, 2004 Route Lucioles,BP 93, FR-06902 Sophia Antipolis, France
[3] Univ Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, INRIA, Grenoble INP,LIG, F-38000 Grenoble, France
[4] Max Planck Inst Software Syst MPI SWS, Campus E1 5, D-66123 Saarbrucken, Germany
关键词
Smart grid; Demand-response; Incentive mechanisms; Energy network; SMART GRIDS; OPTIMIZATION MODELS; SIDE MANAGEMENT; PRICE; USERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.segan.2018.07.005
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Demand-Response (DR) programs, whereby users of an electricity network are encouraged by economic incentives to re-arrange their consumption in order to reduce production costs, are envisioned to be a key feature of the smart grid paradigm. Several recent works proposed DR mechanisms and used analytical models to derive optimal incentives. Most of these works, however, rely on a macroscopic description of the population that does not model individual choices of users. In this paper, we conduct a detailed analysis of those models and we argue that the macroscopic descriptions hide important assumptions that can jeopardize the mechanisms' implementation (such as the ability to make personalized offers and to perfectly estimate the demand that is moved from a timeslot to another). Then, we start from a microscopic description that explicitly models each user's decision. We introduce four DR mechanisms with various assumptions on the provider's capabilities. Contrarily to previous studies, we find that the optimization problems that result from our mechanisms are complex and can be solved numerically only through a heuristic. We present numerical simulations that compare the different mechanisms and their sensitivity to forecast errors. At a high level, our results show that the performance of DR mechanisms under reasonable assumptions on the provider's capabilities are significantly lower than those suggested by previous studies, but that the gap reduces when the population's flexibility increases. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:156 / 166
页数:11
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   A summary of demand response in electricity markets [J].
Albadi, M. H. ;
El-Saadany, E. F. .
ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2008, 78 (11) :1989-1996
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, THINKING FAST SLOW, DOI DOI 10.1037/a0016755
[3]   Optimization Models and Methods for Demand-Side Management of Residential Users: A Survey [J].
Barbato, Antimo ;
Capone, Antonio .
ENERGIES, 2014, 7 (09) :5787-5824
[4]   Smart grids, smart users? The role of the user in demand side management [J].
Goulden, Murray ;
Bedwell, Ben ;
Rennick-Egglestone, Stefan ;
Rodden, Tom ;
Spence, Alexa .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2014, 2 :21-29
[5]   Residential peak electricity demand response-Highlights of some behavioural issues [J].
Gyamfi, Samuel ;
Krumdieck, Susan ;
Urmee, Tania .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 25 :71-77
[6]   Price, environment and security: Exploring multi-modal motivation in voluntary residential peak demand response [J].
Gyamfi, Samuel ;
Krumdieck, Susan .
ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (05) :2993-3004
[7]   Optimized Day-Ahead Pricing for Smart Grids with Device-Specific Scheduling Flexibility [J].
Joe-Wong, Carlee ;
Sen, Soumya ;
Ha, Sangtae ;
Chiang, Mung .
IEEE JOURNAL ON SELECTED AREAS IN COMMUNICATIONS, 2012, 30 (06) :1075-1085
[8]  
Li P, 2014, CHIN CONTR CONF, P7579, DOI 10.1109/ChiCC.2014.6896262
[9]   Exploring the Potential of Energy Consumers in Smart Grid Using Focus Group Methodology [J].
Mesaric, Petra ;
Dukec, Damira ;
Krajcar, Slavko .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (08)
[10]   Log-normal distribution from a process that is not multiplicative but is additive [J].
Mouri, Hideaki .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2013, 88 (04)