Securing personal freedom through institutions: the role of electoral democracy and judicial independence

被引:13
作者
Berggren, Niclas [1 ,2 ]
Gutmann, Jerg [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Res Inst Ind Econ IFN, Box 55665, S-10215 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Univ Econ Prague, Dept Econ KEKE NF, Prague, Czech Republic
[3] Univ Hamburg, Inst Law & Econ, Johnsallee 35, D-20148 Hamburg, Germany
[4] CESifo, Munich, Germany
关键词
Freedom; Democracy; Judicial independence; Political economy; Institutions; PROPERTY-RIGHTS; HAPPINESS; GROWTH; RULE; DICTATORSHIP; LAW;
D O I
10.1007/s10657-020-09643-9
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We investigate empirically how electoral democracy and judicial independence relate to personal freedom. While judicial independence is positively and robustly related to personal freedom in all its forms, electoral democracy displays a robust, positive relationship with only two out of seven types of personal freedom (freedom of association, assembly and civil society; freedom of expression and information). Interaction terms and more refined indicators of the political system reveal that countries without elections or with only one political party benefit more from judicial independence than both democracies and multi-party systems without free elections.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 186
页数:22
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [1] De Facto Judicial Independence and Physical Integrity Rights
    Abouharb, M. Rodwan
    Moyer, Laura P.
    Schmidt, Megan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HUMAN RIGHTS, 2013, 12 (04) : 367 - 396
  • [2] Democracy Does Cause Growth
    Acemoglu, Daron
    Naidu, Suresh
    Restrepo, Pascual
    Robinson, James A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2019, 127 (01) : 47 - 100
  • [3] Natural resources and the tradeoff between authoritarianism and development
    Al-Ubaydli, Omar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2012, 81 (01) : 137 - 152
  • [4] The Role of the Judiciary in the Public Decision-Making Process
    Albanese, Giuseppe
    Sorge, Marco M.
    [J]. ECONOMICS & POLITICS, 2012, 24 (01) : 1 - 23
  • [5] Alt JamesE., 2008, ECON POLIT-OXFORD, V20, P33, DOI [10.1111/j.1468-0343.2007.00319.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1468-0343.2007.00319.X]
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1998, Politics by Principle, Not Interest
  • [7] Roots of tolerance among second-generation immigrants
    Berggren, Niclas
    Ljunge, Martin
    Nilsson, Therese
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 15 (06) : 999 - 1016
  • [8] What Aspects of Society Matter for the Quality of Life of a Minority? Global Evidence from the New Gay Happiness Index
    Berggren, Niclas
    Bjornskov, Christian
    Nilsson, Therese
    [J]. SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2017, 132 (03) : 1163 - 1192
  • [9] Does belief in objective morality lead to coercion? An analysis of the arguments of Kelsen and Buchanan
    Berggren, Niclas
    [J]. REVIEW OF AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS, 2016, 29 (03) : 315 - 326
  • [10] Does religiosity promote property rights and the rule of law?
    Berggren, Niclas
    Bjornskov, Christian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 9 (02) : 161 - 185