Accurate white blood cell differential by Alinity hq: A comparison with flow cytometry and manual differential

被引:3
作者
Gambell, Peter [1 ]
Rowley, Grant [1 ]
Pham, Tracy Anh Thu [1 ]
Dang, Theresa Loan [2 ]
Mulumba, Huguette [2 ]
Smith, Larry [2 ]
Lakos, Gabriella [2 ]
机构
[1] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Abbott, 4551Great Amer Pkwy, Santa Clara, CA 95054 USA
关键词
differentiation; flow cytometry; hematology analyzer; leukocytes; COUNTS; ENUMERATION; CYTODIFF; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1111/ijlh.13764
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction White blood cell (WBC) differential by flow cytometry can report a six-part WBC differential and enumerate blasts. Some modern hematology analyzers are also able to provide a six-part WBC differential (including immature granulocytes). Our goal was to compare the WBC differential obtained by the Abbott Alinity hq hematology analyzer to an 8-color single-tube flow cytometry method and to manual WBC differential. Methods Samples from 144 patients were tested with Alinity hq, flow cytometry, and microscopic WBC differential. The WBC count ranged from 1.22 to 359 x 10(9)/L, and 34 samples were flagged by the analyzer for abnormal WBC morphology. Results Strong concordance was demonstrated between Alinity hq and flow cytometry for all six components of the differential, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.86 (basophils) to 1.00 (lymphocytes). Small, clinically insignificant positive difference was observed between Alinity hq and flow cytometry for mature and total neutrophils (2.51% and 1.85%) and eosinophils (0.14%), and small negative difference for immature granulocytes (-0.65%), lymphocytes (-0.61%), and basophils (-0.21%). No bias was detected between the Alinity hq and flow cytometry monocyte counts. Alinity hq and flow cytometry results agreed with the manual differential, apart from small, clinically insignificant differences. Alinity hq nucleated red blood cell concentrations were equivalent with the manual results (r = 0.95, slope = 1.16). The percentage of blasts by flow cytometry demonstrated good correlation and agreement with the manual count (r = 0.99, slope = 1.35). Conclusion Alinity hq has produced accurate six-part WBC differential in this three-way comparison, equivalent to flow cytometry and morphological classification.
引用
收藏
页码:288 / 295
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Is the Blood Basophil Count Sufficiently Precise, Accurate, and Specific? Three Automated Hematology Instruments and Flow Cytometry Compared [J].
Amundsen, Erik K. ;
Henriksson, Carola E. ;
Holthe, Mette R. ;
Urdal, Petter .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2012, 137 (01) :86-92
[2]  
Barnes P W, 2005, Lab Hematol, V11, P83, DOI 10.1532/LH96.05019
[3]   Can automated blood film analysis replace the manual differential? An evaluation of the CellaVision DM96 automated image analysis system [J].
Briggs, C. ;
Longair, I. ;
Slavik, M. ;
Thwaite, K. ;
Mills, R. ;
Thavaraja, V. ;
Foster, A. ;
Romanin, D. ;
Machin, S. J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LABORATORY HEMATOLOGY, 2009, 31 (01) :48-60
[4]  
Bruegel M., 2004, SYSMEX J INT, V14, P5
[5]   Evaluation of an 8-Color Flow Cytometric Reference Method for White Blood Cell Differential Enumeration [J].
Cherian, Sindhu ;
Levin, Greg ;
Lo, Wing Yin ;
Mauck, Megan ;
Kuhn, Donald ;
Lee, Crystol ;
Wood, Brent L. .
CYTOMETRY PART B-CLINICAL CYTOMETRY, 2010, 78B (05) :319-328
[6]   NEUTROPHIL FC-GAMMA-RIIIB DEFICIENCY, NATURE, AND CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES - A STUDY OF 21 INDIVIDUALS FROM 14 FAMILIES [J].
DEHAAS, M ;
KLEIJER, M ;
VANZWIETEN, R ;
ROOS, D ;
VONDEMBORNE, AEGK .
BLOOD, 1995, 86 (06) :2403-2413
[7]   Flowcytometric analysis of basophil counts in human blood and inaccuracy of hematology analyzers [J].
Ducrest, S ;
Meier, F ;
Tschopp, C ;
Pavlovic, R ;
Dahinden, CA .
ALLERGY, 2005, 60 (11) :1446-1450
[8]   Automated enumeration of immature Granulocytes [J].
Fernandes, Bernard ;
Hamaguchi, Yukio .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2007, 128 (03) :454-463
[9]  
Fujimoto H, 2000, CYTOMETRY, V42, P371, DOI 10.1002/1097-0320(20001215)42:6<371::AID-CYTO1004>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-G