Collaborative Sparse Priors for Multi-view ATR

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Xuelu [1 ]
Monga, Vishal [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, State Coll, PA 16801 USA
来源
AUTOMATIC TARGET RECOGNITION XXVIII | 2018年 / 10648卷
关键词
infrared images; SRC; spike and Slab priors; re-weighted-l(1) method; VARIABLE SELECTION; REPRESENTATION; RECOGNITION; SPIKE;
D O I
10.1117/12.2305387
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Recent work has seen a surge of sparse representation based classification (SRC) methods applied to automatic target recognition problems. While traditional SRC approaches used l(0) or l(1) norm to quantify sparsity, spike and slab priors have established themselves as the gold standard for providing general tunable sparse structures on vectors. In this work, we employ collaborative spike and slab priors that can be applied to matrices to encourage sparsity for the problem of multi-view ATR. That is, target images captured from multiple views are expanded in terms of a training dictionary multiplied with a coefficient matrix. Ideally, for a test image set comprising of multiple views of a target, coefficients corresponding to its identifying class are expected to be active, while others should be zero, i.e. the coefficient matrix is naturally sparse. We develop a new approach to solve the optimization problem that estimates the sparse coefficient matrix jointly with the sparsity inducing parameters in the collaborative prior. ATR problems are investigated on the mid-wave infrared (MWIR) database made available by the US Army Night Vision and Electronic Sensors Directorate, which has a rich collection of views. Experimental results show that the proposed joint prior and coefficient estimation method (JPCEM) can: 1.) enable improved accuracy when multiple views vs. a single one are invoked, and 2.) outperform state of the art alternatives particularly when training imagery is limited.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Comprehensive Survey on Multi-View Clustering
    Fang, Uno
    Li, Man
    Li, Jianxin
    Gao, Longxiang
    Jia, Tao
    Zhang, Yanchun
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE AND DATA ENGINEERING, 2023, 35 (12) : 12350 - 12368
  • [22] VIEW SELECTION POLICY FOR MULTI-VIEW VIDEO DELIVERY
    Chakareski, Jacob
    2013 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (ICASSP), 2013, : 3736 - 3740
  • [23] Multi-View MERA Subspace Clustering
    Long, Zhen
    Zhu, Ce
    Chen, Jie
    Li, Zihan
    Ren, Yazhou
    Liu, Yipeng
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MULTIMEDIA, 2024, 26 : 3102 - 3112
  • [24] Multi-View Learning With Incomplete Views
    Xu, Chang
    Tao, Dacheng
    Xu, Chao
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2015, 24 (12) : 5812 - 5825
  • [25] Parallel Multi-view Low-rank and Sparse Subspace Clustering for Unsupervised Hyperspectral Image Classification
    Tian, Long
    Du, Qian
    2018 ASIA-PACIFIC SIGNAL AND INFORMATION PROCESSING ASSOCIATION ANNUAL SUMMIT AND CONFERENCE (APSIPA ASC), 2018, : 618 - 621
  • [26] Safe Multi-View Deep Classification
    Liu, Wei
    Chen, Yufei
    Yue, Xiaodong
    Zhang, Changqing
    Xie, Shaorong
    THIRTY-SEVENTH AAAI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, VOL 37 NO 7, 2023, : 8870 - 8878
  • [27] Underwater Small Target Classification Using Sparse Multi-View Discriminant Analysis and the Invariant Scattering Transform
    Christensen, Andrew
    Sen Gupta, Ananya
    Kirsteins, Ivars
    JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2024, 12 (10)
  • [28] Orthogonal multi-view analysis by successive approximations via eigenvectors
    Wang, Li
    Zhang, Lei -Hong
    Shen, Chungen
    Li, Ren-Cang
    NEUROCOMPUTING, 2022, 512 : 100 - 116
  • [29] Multi-View and 3D Deformable Part Models
    Pepik, Bojan
    Stark, Michael
    Gehler, Peter
    Schiele, Bernt
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2015, 37 (11) : 2232 - 2245
  • [30] STRUCTURED SPARSE PRIORS FOR IMAGE CLASSIFICATION
    Srinivas, Umamahesh
    Suo, Yuanming
    Dao, Minh
    Monga, Vishal
    Tran, Trac D.
    2013 20TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING (ICIP 2013), 2013, : 3211 - 3215