Participants' experience of approach bias modification training with transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as a combination treatment for binge eating disorder

被引:9
作者
Gordon, Gemma [1 ]
Williamson, Grace [2 ]
Gkofa, Vasiliki [3 ]
Schmidt, Ulrike [1 ]
Brockmeyer, Timo [4 ]
Campbell, Iain [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat Psychol & Neurosci, Dept Psychol Med, Sect Eating Disorders, London SE5 8AF, England
[2] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat Psychol & Neurosci, London, England
[3] UCL, Div Psychiat, London, England
[4] Univ Gottingen, Inst Psychol, Dept Clin Psychol & Psychotherapy, Gottingen, Germany
关键词
approach bias modification training (ABM); binge eating disorder; eating disorders; neuromodulation; transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS); ENDURING ANOREXIA-NERVOSA; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; BRAIN-STIMULATION; NEUROMODULATION; PREVALENCE; ADULTS; RTMS; TDCS;
D O I
10.1002/erv.2859
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objective This study explored participants' experience of approach bias modification training (ABM) with transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) for binge eating disorder (BED) within a randomised controlled trial (RCT). A subset of participants who completed the RCT were interviewed to attain feedback on treatment experience and outcomes. Method 15 participants with BED who completed the RCT were recruited, using purposive sampling. Participants received six sessions of concurrent ABM training with either real or sham tDCS. Semi-structured interviews relating to study experience and treatment outcomes were conducted and data were analysed thematically. Results The combined ABM and tDCS intervention was deemed acceptable and worthwhile by participants interviewed across both intervention groups. Negative preconceptions of tDCS were an initial deterrent to study participation for some, yet the brain stimulation experience was found to be tolerable. Minor and transient sensations and side effects attributed to tDCS were reported by most participants during and after stimulation, in addition to less pleasant aspects of ABM training, with no significant adverse effects reported by interviewees. Positive outcomes were described by participants across both intervention groups, relating to changes in BED symptoms and to broader beneficial effects on associated cognitive and emotional factors. Two participants experienced a shift in autonomy, attributed to tDCS and the combined intervention respectively. Conclusions Adults with symptoms of BED found concurrent ABM and tDCS sessions to be acceptable, despite initial apprehension about the safety of tDCS. Findings are relevant to the neuroethics literature and may inform science communication strategies on neuromodulation treatments.
引用
收藏
页码:969 / 984
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Clinical Trial with Combined Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Attentional Bias Modification in Alcohol-Dependent Patients
    den Uyl, Tess E.
    Gladwin, Thomas E.
    Lindenmeyer, Johannes
    Wiers, Reinout W.
    [J]. ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2018, 42 (10): : 1961 - 1969
  • [32] Transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of major depressive disorder: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Yuan, Wang
    [J]. PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2019, 276 : 186 - 190
  • [33] Transcranial direct current stimulation in the treatment of alcohol, tobacco and opioid use disorder in clinical studies
    Cabuk, Begum Merve
    Guleken, Zozan
    [J]. ACTA NEUROBIOLOGIAE EXPERIMENTALIS, 2024, 84 (02) : 111 - 127
  • [34] Efficacy of pre-supplementary motor area transcranial direct current stimulation for treatment resistant obsessive compulsive disorder: A randomized, double blinded, sham controlled trial
    Gowda, Shayanth M.
    Narayanaswamy, Janardhanan C.
    Hazari, Nandita
    Bose, Anushree
    Chhabra, Harleen
    Balachander, Srinivas
    Bhaskarapillai, Binukumar
    Shivakumar, Venkataram
    Venkatasubramanian, Ganesan
    Reddy, Y. C. Janardhan
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2019, 12 (04) : 922 - 929
  • [35] Impact of transcranial direct current stimulation on attentional bias for threat: a proof-of-concept study among individuals with social anxiety disorder
    Heeren, Alexandre
    Billieux, Joel
    Philippot, Pierre
    De Raedt, Rudi
    Baeken, Chris
    de Timary, Philippe
    Maurage, Pierre
    Vanderhasselt, Marie-Anne
    [J]. SOCIAL COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 12 (02) : 251 - 260
  • [36] Electrophysiological and Behavioral Effects of Combined Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Alcohol Approach Bias Retraining in Hazardous Drinkers
    den Uyl, Tess E.
    Gladwin, Thomas E.
    Wiers, Reinout W.
    [J]. ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2016, 40 (10) : 2124 - 2133
  • [37] CATHODAL TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION OF THE EXTRASTRIATE VISUAL CORTEX MODULATES IMPLICIT ANTI-FAT BIAS IN MALE, BUT NOT FEMALE, PARTICIPANTS
    Cazzato, Valentina
    Makris, Stergios
    Urgesi, Cosimo
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 359 : 92 - 104
  • [38] Transcranial direct current stimulation combined with visuo-motor training as treatment for chronic stroke patients
    Pavlova, Elena L.
    Lindberg, Pavel
    Khan, Amirah
    Ruschkowski, Sigurd
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    Borg, Jorgen
    [J]. RESTORATIVE NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 35 (03) : 307 - 317
  • [39] Transcranial direct current stimulation in treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder: An open-label pilot study
    Bation, Remy
    Poulet, Emmanuel
    Haesebaert, Frederic
    Saoud, Mohamed
    Brunelin, Jerome
    [J]. PROGRESS IN NEURO-PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY & BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 65 : 153 - 157
  • [40] A randomized controlled trial of transcranial direct-current stimulation and cognitive training in children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder
    Boroda, Elias
    Krueger, Alyssa M.
    Bansal, Priya
    Schumacher, Mariah J.
    Roy, Abhrajeet, V
    Boys, Christopher J.
    Lim, Kelvin O.
    Wozniak, Jeffrey R.
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2020, 13 (04) : 1059 - 1068