Participants' experience of approach bias modification training with transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as a combination treatment for binge eating disorder

被引:10
作者
Gordon, Gemma [1 ]
Williamson, Grace [2 ]
Gkofa, Vasiliki [3 ]
Schmidt, Ulrike [1 ]
Brockmeyer, Timo [4 ]
Campbell, Iain [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat Psychol & Neurosci, Dept Psychol Med, Sect Eating Disorders, London SE5 8AF, England
[2] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat Psychol & Neurosci, London, England
[3] UCL, Div Psychiat, London, England
[4] Univ Gottingen, Inst Psychol, Dept Clin Psychol & Psychotherapy, Gottingen, Germany
关键词
approach bias modification training (ABM); binge eating disorder; eating disorders; neuromodulation; transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS); ENDURING ANOREXIA-NERVOSA; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; BRAIN-STIMULATION; NEUROMODULATION; PREVALENCE; ADULTS; RTMS; TDCS;
D O I
10.1002/erv.2859
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objective This study explored participants' experience of approach bias modification training (ABM) with transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) for binge eating disorder (BED) within a randomised controlled trial (RCT). A subset of participants who completed the RCT were interviewed to attain feedback on treatment experience and outcomes. Method 15 participants with BED who completed the RCT were recruited, using purposive sampling. Participants received six sessions of concurrent ABM training with either real or sham tDCS. Semi-structured interviews relating to study experience and treatment outcomes were conducted and data were analysed thematically. Results The combined ABM and tDCS intervention was deemed acceptable and worthwhile by participants interviewed across both intervention groups. Negative preconceptions of tDCS were an initial deterrent to study participation for some, yet the brain stimulation experience was found to be tolerable. Minor and transient sensations and side effects attributed to tDCS were reported by most participants during and after stimulation, in addition to less pleasant aspects of ABM training, with no significant adverse effects reported by interviewees. Positive outcomes were described by participants across both intervention groups, relating to changes in BED symptoms and to broader beneficial effects on associated cognitive and emotional factors. Two participants experienced a shift in autonomy, attributed to tDCS and the combined intervention respectively. Conclusions Adults with symptoms of BED found concurrent ABM and tDCS sessions to be acceptable, despite initial apprehension about the safety of tDCS. Findings are relevant to the neuroethics literature and may inform science communication strategies on neuromodulation treatments.
引用
收藏
页码:969 / 984
页数:16
相关论文
共 48 条
[31]  
McLellan E., 2016, FIELD METHOD, V15, P63, DOI DOI 10.1177/1525822X02239573
[32]   'Woe Betides Anybody Who Tries to Turn me Down.' A Qualitative Analysis of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms Following Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease [J].
Mosley, Philip E. ;
Robinson, Katherine ;
Coyne, Terry ;
Silburn, Peter ;
Breakspear, Michael ;
Carter, Adrian .
NEUROETHICS, 2021, 14 (SUPPL 1) :47-63
[33]  
Nitsche M.A., 2015, Textbook of Neuromodulation, P101, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-1408-1_9
[34]   Health services research - Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions [J].
Oakley, A ;
Strange, V ;
Bonell, C ;
Allen, E ;
Stephenson, J .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 332 (7538) :413-416
[35]   Deep Brain Stimulation in Anorexia Nervosa: Hope for the Hopeless or Exploitation of the Vulnerable? The Oxford Neuroethics Gold Standard Framework [J].
Park, Rebecca J. ;
Singh, Ilina ;
Pike, Alexandra C. ;
Tan, Jacinta O. A. .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 8
[36]  
Radden Jennifer., 1996, DIVIDED MINDS SUCCES
[37]   The effect of expectation on transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to suppress food craving and eating in individuals with overweight and obesity [J].
Ray, Mary Katherine ;
Sylvester, Maria D. ;
Helton, Alexis ;
Pittman, Bethany R. ;
Wagstaff, Laura E. ;
McRae, Tommy R., III ;
Turan, Bulent ;
Fontaine, Kevin R. ;
Amthor, Franklin R. ;
Boggiano, Mary M. .
APPETITE, 2019, 136 :1-7
[38]   Relapse Prevention in Abstinent Alcoholics by Cognitive Bias Modification: Clinical Effects of Combining Approach Bias Modification and Attention Bias Modification [J].
Rinck, Mike ;
Wiers, Reinout W. ;
Becker, Eni S. ;
Lindenmeyer, Johannes .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 86 (12) :1005-1016
[39]  
S Beglin., 2008, COGNITIVE BEHAV THER
[40]   Autonomy and Enhancement [J].
Schaefer, G. Owen ;
Kahane, Guy ;
Savulescu, Julian .
NEUROETHICS, 2014, 7 (02) :123-136