Identifying components in consent information needed to support informed decision making about trial participation: An interview study with women managing cancer

被引:16
作者
Abhyankar, Purva [1 ]
Velikova, Galina [2 ]
Summers, Barbara [3 ]
Bekker, Hilary L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Hlth Sci, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Mol Med, St Jamess Inst Oncol, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ Leeds, Sch Business, Ctr Decis Res, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
Shared decision making; Informed consent; Trial participation; Cancer treatment; Decision aids; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; CLINICAL-TRIALS; WRITTEN INFORMATION; CHOICE; PART; RECRUITMENT; PERCEPTIONS; EXPERIENCES; DOCUMENTS; REASONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.05.040
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Research governance requires patients give informed consent to participate in clinical trials. However, there are concerns that consent information may not support patient participation decisions. This study investigates the utility of consent information in supporting women's trial participation decisions when receiving treatment for cancer. Design: An interview study with women receiving cancer treatments at a medical oncology outpatient clinic in Yorkshire (UK). All women over 18 years, not admitted to a hospital ward and who had currently or previously been invited to take part in a trial were invited to take part in the study over a three month period. Interviews were audio-tape recorded, transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis. Results: Of those eligible (n = 41), 21 women with breast (n = 11), ovarian (n = 8) and endometrial (n = 2) cancer participated (mean age = 57 years). Eighteen had made at least one trial decision and three were considering taking part in a trial. Findings are synthesised under two analytical themes: 1) Influence of the cancer and cancer treatment context on decision making for trial participation; and 2) Experiences of the consenting process and their influence on decision making. Conclusions: Designing trial information to represent explicitly the trial participation decision as being between standard care and study-related care options is more likely to effectively support patients in making informed decisions between standard care treatments and taking part in a trial. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 91
页数:9
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Abhyankar P., 2008, THESIS
[2]   Framing Options as Choice or Opportunity: Does the Frame Influence Decisions? [J].
Abhyankar, Purva ;
Summers, Barbara A. ;
Velikova, Galina ;
Bekker, Hilary L. .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2014, 34 (05) :567-582
[3]   Balancing the presentation of information and options in patient decision aids: an updated review [J].
Abhyankar, Purva ;
Volk, Robert J. ;
Blumenthal-Barby, Jennifer ;
Bravo, Paulina ;
Buchholz, Angela ;
Ozanne, Elissa ;
Vidal, Dale Colins ;
Col, Nananda ;
Stalmeier, Peep .
BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2013, 13
[4]   Why values elicitation techniques enable people to make informed decisions about cancer trial participation [J].
Abhyankar, Purva ;
Bekker, Hilary L. ;
Summers, Barbara A. ;
Velikova, Galina .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2011, 14 :20-32
[5]   World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects [J].
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 310 (20) :2191-2194
[6]   Do informed consent documents for cancer trials do what they should? A study of manifest and latent functions [J].
Armstrong, Natalie ;
Dixon-Woods, Mary ;
Thomas, Anne ;
Rusk, Gill ;
Tarrant, Carolyn .
SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS, 2012, 34 (08) :1230-1245
[7]   Suggestions From Adolescents, Young Adults, and Parents for Improving Informed Consent in Phase 1 Pediatric Oncology Trials [J].
Baker, Justin N. ;
Leek, Angela C. ;
Salas, Halle Showalter ;
Drotar, Dennis ;
Noll, Robert ;
Rheingold, Susan R. ;
Kodish, Eric D. .
CANCER, 2013, 119 (23) :4154-4161
[8]  
Bekker H, 1999, Health Technol Assess, V3, P1
[9]   Cancer patient decision making related to clinical trial participation: an integrative review with implications for patients' relational autonomy [J].
Bell, Jennifer A. H. ;
Balneaves, Lynda G. .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2015, 23 (04) :1169-1196
[10]   Can the written information to research subjects be improved? - an empirical study [J].
Bjorn, E ;
Rossel, P ;
Holm, S .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 1999, 25 (03) :263-267