An investigation of SOAR study strategies for learning from multiple online resources

被引:20
|
作者
Daher, Tareq A. [1 ]
Kiewra, Kenneth A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska Lincoln, 1520 20th Circle, Lincoln, NE 68503 USA
[2] Univ Nebraska Lincoln, TEAC 240, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA
关键词
SOAR; Study strategies; Online learning; Multiple-document learning; COGNITIVE-PROCESSES; SELF-REGULATION; COMPREHENSION; NOTETAKING; TEXT; METACOGNITION; INFORMATION; LECTURE; PART;
D O I
10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.12.004
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
This mixed-methods study investigated the effects of the SOAR study strategy for learning from multiple online resources. SOAR includes the components of selection, organization, association, and regulation. Past research confirmed that college students who study provided or partially provided SOAR materials achieved more than those using their preferred study methods when learning from a single printed (Jairam & Kiewra, 2009) or computer-based (Jairam & Kiewra, 2010) text. The present study was the first to investigate SOAR when college students create their own study materials and must learn from multiple online resources. In the present study, one hundred and thirty-four college students were assigned randomly to the preferred strategy control group or the SOAR strategy experimental group. Following a pre-survey and online training in their respective study strategy, both groups were directed to use their trained strategy to study scientific material available on multiple websites. Following the study period, participants were tested on the online material and then completed a post-survey. Qualitative analyses of pre-survey responses (before training) indicated that participants from both groups commonly use note taking, summarization, and memorization strategies to study online resources. Qualitative analyses of post survey responses (after training) indicated that the preferred strategies control group used these same strategies to study the experimental material, whereas the SOAR-trained group used SOAR strategies. These qualitative data fit with quantitative data showing that (a) both groups created study materials reflective of their strategy training (preferred or SOAR); (b) SOAR strategy studiers achieved more than preferred strategy studiers on fact, relationship, and concept achievement items; and (c) SOAR-trained studiers had more positive attitudes about their trained methods than preferred-trained studiers. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 21
页数:12
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据