Advantages and Disadvantages of Modeling Beliefs by Single Item and Scale Models in the Context of the Theory of Planned Behavior

被引:6
作者
Heuckmann, Benedikt [1 ]
Hammann, Marcus [1 ]
Asshoff, Roman [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munster, Ctr Biol Educ, Schlosspl 34, D-48143 Munster, Germany
来源
EDUCATION SCIENCES | 2019年 / 9卷 / 04期
关键词
theory of planned behavior; beliefs; MIMIC model; cancer education; structural equation modeling; biology education; intervention; teacher training; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS; REASONED ACTION; TEACHERS BELIEFS; PROFESSIONAL-DEVELOPMENT; EDUCATIONAL-RESEARCH; SCIENCE TEACHERS; CANCER; PERCEPTIONS; RELIABILITY; IMPUTATION;
D O I
10.3390/educsci9040268
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Teachers' beliefs about science teaching vary greatly. To analyze the relationships between teachers' beliefs and other variables related to teaching and learning, researchers can use the following two options: single item belief models or belief scales. In this study, we compared both models in the context of teachers' beliefs regarding teaching about cancer. Although both models exhibited a good model fit, each approach had both advantages and disadvantages when we judged the modelling approaches in terms of fulfilling the requirements of common psychometric standards and adequately acknowledging the diversity of different beliefs. We discuss the predictive value of both models and their contribution to planning belief-based interventions for cancer education. We argue that researchers should combine the advantages of single item and scale models when analyzing the diversity of teachers' beliefs.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 89 条