BPM and change management An ambidextrous perspective

被引:48
作者
Binci, Daniele [1 ]
Belisari, Sara [2 ]
Appolloni, Andrea [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Dept Management & Law, Rome, Italy
关键词
Total quality management; Change; Ambidexterity; Resistance; Business process management; Business process re-engineering; Ambiguity; BUSINESS-PROCESS MANAGEMENT; ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY; MEDIATING ROLE; EXPLORATION; EXPLOITATION; ANTECEDENTS; FIELD;
D O I
10.1108/BPMJ-06-2018-0158
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to focus on the implementation of an ambidexterity strategy in a large Italian Company that works in the energy field. The aim of the study is to understand how contextual ambidexterity has been achieved during a business process management (BPM) approach by describing the main variables that interacted during the project implementation. Design/methodology/approach The authors based their study both on primary (direct observation and interviews) and secondary (company manuals, books and procedures) qualitative investigations of BPM approach based on three business process re-engineering (BPR) projects and nine total quality management (TQM) projects, focused on change team behaviors, dynamics and dialogues. Findings The authors observed that the implementation of simultaneously radical and incremental change projects has been influenced by the exploration and exploitation activities related to every single TQM and BPR project considered. The findings suggest that the overall project has been influenced by four main underlying variables, which are task specialization and systems interoperability (knowledge transfer), identity and leadership (knowledge conversion) and two output variables (ambiguity and feedback to change), that, by interacting, enable ambidexterity. Practical implications Managers need to be cognizant and aware both of the BPM techniques, in order to sustain ambidexterity, and of ambiguity and change feedback as variables that enable the effective connection of the different steps of innovation or refinement strategy and, therefore, of ambidexterity. Moreover, the contextual factors such as leadership and people identity should be considered and managed as important variables related to change. Originality/value The originality of this paper is related to improving the understanding of how to implement the theoretical concept of ambidexterity in a real world organization, by providing new evidence that highlights the importance of contextual ambidexterity within a structural ambidexterity strategy during a BPM project.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 23
页数:23
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
Al-Mashari M., 2000, BUS PROCESS MANAG J, V6, P10, DOI DOI 10.1108/14637150010283045
[2]  
Al-Mashari M., 2001, Bus. Process Manage. J, V7, P437, DOI [10.1108/14637150110406812, DOI 10.1108/14637150110406812]
[3]   Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation [J].
Andriopoulos, Constantine ;
Lewis, Marianne W. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2009, 20 (04) :696-717
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, SCHMAL BUS REV
[5]  
[Anonymous], SHARED LEADERSHIP RE
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2004, ORG CULTURE LEADERSH
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1993, Process Innovation - Reengineering Work through Information Technology
[8]   Knowledge transfer in organizations: Learning from the experience of others [J].
Argote, L ;
Ingram, P ;
Levine, JM ;
Moreland, RL .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2000, 82 (01) :1-8
[9]  
Beech N, 2012, MANAGING CHANGE: ENQUIRY AND ACTION, P1, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139047548
[10]   Dialogues between Academics and Practitioners: The Role of Generative Dialogic Encounters [J].
Beech, Nic ;
MacIntosh, Robert ;
MacLean, Donald .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2010, 31 (9-10) :1341-1367