Is SUVmax of 18F-FDG PET/CT Predictive Factor for Malignancy in Gastrointestinal Tract?

被引:3
作者
Ozaslan, Ersin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kiziltepe, Melih [4 ]
Addulrezzak, Ummuhan [5 ]
Kula, Mustafa [5 ]
Bozkurt, Oktay [3 ]
Kut, Engin [2 ]
Duran, Ayse O. [3 ]
Ucar, Mahmut [3 ]
Sakalar, Teoman [3 ]
Dogan, Ender [3 ]
Topaloglu, Ulas S. [4 ]
Inanc, Mevlude [2 ,3 ]
Ozkan, Metin [3 ]
机构
[1] Acibadem Univ, Kayseri Acibadem Hosp, Fac Med, Dept Med Oncol, Kayseri, Turkey
[2] Kayseri Training & Res Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, TR-38010 Kayseri, Turkey
[3] Erciyes Univ, Dept Med Oncol, Fac Med, Kayseri, Turkey
[4] Kayseri Training & Res Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Kayseri, Turkey
[5] Erciyes Univ, Dept Nucl Med, Fac Med, Kayseri, Turkey
关键词
SUVmax; Gastrointestinal Tract; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18; Positron Emission Tomography; PET; CT; POSITRON-EMISSION; F-18; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE; FDG-PET; TOMOGRAPHY; LESIONS; CANCER; FOCI;
D O I
10.4103/njcp.njcp_637_18
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Increasing use of 18F-FDG PET/CT in cancer patients, has led to more common detection of 18F- FDG uptake in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). Aims: The objective of this study was to assess 18F-FDG uptake in incidental and known GIT malignancy. Methods: A total of 6500 patients followed-up in a single and tertiary center between January 2010 and September 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Of 2850 patients assessed with 18FDG-PET/CT, known GIT malignancy and 18F-FDG uptake cases during follow-up were included in the study. Results: Of 658 patients with 18F-FDG uptake, 150 patients who underwent endoscopy were included in the study. Seventy-seven of these patients had known GIT malignancy and 73 had incidental 18F-FDG uptake. Among these 73 patients; 7 (9.6%) had malignancy, 20 (27,2%) adenoma and 24 (32.9%) inflammation that were confirmed. Endoscopy was normal in 22 (30.2%) patients. One hundred forty-three (95.3%) patients had focal and 7 (4.7%) had diffuse uptake. While no malignancy was detected in patients with diffuse uptake, 58.7% (84/143) of the patients with focal uptake presented malignancy. Mean the standardized uptake value (SUV) max values were found as 15.0 +/- 10.6 (range, 3.8-56.5) in malignant disease, 10.2 +/- 4.3 (range, 2.4-19.7) in adenoma, 7.3 +/- 3.6 (range, 3.6-18.7) in inflammation, and 9.8 +/- 4.2 (range, 3.8-19.9) in normal endoscopy groups (p < 0.001, rho = 0.378). Conclusion: Although this study demonstrated high probability of malignant disease with increased 18F-FDG uptake in the GIT, it would be a more appropriate approach to confirm all patients with 18F-FDG uptake through endoscopy as SUVmax values vary in a wide range.
引用
收藏
页码:1217 / 1224
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Staging of primary colorectal carcinomas with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose whole-body PET: Correlation with histopathologic and CT findings [J].
Abdel-Nabi, H ;
Doerr, RJ ;
Lamonica, DM ;
Cronin, VR ;
Galantowicz, P ;
Carbone, GM ;
Spaulding, MB .
RADIOLOGY, 1998, 206 (03) :755-760
[2]   Positron Emission Tomography Imaging of Cancer Biology: Current Status and Future Prospects [J].
Chen, Kai ;
Chen, Xiaoyuan .
SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 2011, 38 (01) :70-86
[3]   Diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT for detecting synchronous advanced colorectal neoplasia in patients with gastric cancer [J].
Choi, Byung Wook ;
Kim, Hae Won ;
Won, Kyoung Sook ;
Song, Bong-Il ;
Cho, Kwang Bum ;
Bae, Sung Uk .
MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (36)
[4]   Evaluation of (pre-)malignant colonic abnormalities: endoscopic validation of FDG-PET findings [J].
Drenth, JPH ;
Nagengast, FM ;
Oyen, WJG .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2001, 28 (12) :1766-1769
[5]   Incidental focal colonic lesions found on 18Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan: further support for a national guideline on definitive management [J].
Farquharson, A. L. ;
Chopra, A. ;
Ford, A. ;
Matthews, S. ;
Amin, S. N. ;
De Noronha, R. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2012, 14 (02) :e56-e63
[6]  
Gupta N C, 1993, Nebr Med J, V78, P30
[7]   Incidental colonic focal lesions detected by FDG PET/CT [J].
Gutman, F ;
Alberini, JL ;
Wartski, M ;
Vilain, D ;
Le Stanc, E ;
Sarandi, F ;
Corone, C ;
Tainturier, C ;
Pecking, AP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2005, 185 (02) :495-500
[8]  
Israel O, 2005, J NUCL MED, V46, P758
[9]  
Kamel EM, 2004, J NUCL MED, V45, P1804
[10]  
Kei PL, 2010, AM J ROENTGENOL, V194, P401