What Is My Next Step? School Students' Perceptions of Feedback

被引:29
作者
Brooks, Cameron [1 ]
Huang, Yangtao [2 ]
Hattie, John [3 ]
Carroll, Annemaree [4 ]
Burton, Rochelle [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Educ, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Inst Social Sci Res, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Grad Sch Educ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ Queensland, Fac Humanities & Social Sci, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
feedback; learning; self-regulation; perceptions; assessment; teachers; FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT; MODEL; CONCEPTIONS; TEACHERS; VALIDITY; BELIEFS; QUALITY; FIT;
D O I
10.3389/feduc.2019.00096
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Feedback literature is dominated by claims of large effect sizes, yet there are remarkable levels of variability relating to the effects of feedback. The same feedback can be effective for one student but not another, and in one situation but not another. There is a need to better understand how students are receiving feedback and currently there is relatively little research on school students' perceptions of feedback. In contrast, current social constructivist and self-regulatory models of feedback see the learner as an active agent in receiving, interpreting, and applying feedback information. This paper aims to investigate school student perceptions of feedback through designing a student feedback perception questionnaire (SFPQ) based upon a conceptual model of feedback. The questionnaire was used to collect data about the helpfulness to learning of different feedback types and levels. Results demonstrate that the questionnaire partially affirms the conceptual model of feedback. Items pertaining to feed forward (improvement based feedback) were reported by students as most helpful to learning. Implications for teaching and learning are discussed, in regard to how students receive feedback.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 84 条
[71]  
Tabachnick B. G., 2013, USING MULTIVARIATE S
[72]   Trust and Electronic Government Success: An Empirical Study [J].
Teo, Thompson S. H. ;
Srivastava, Shirish C. ;
Jiang, Li .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2008, 25 (03) :99-131
[73]  
Thompson B., 2004, EXPLORATORY CONFIRMA, DOI DOI 10.1037/10694-000
[74]   A proof of the law of effect [J].
Thorndike, EL .
SCIENCE, 1933, 77 :173-175
[75]   Understanding feedback: A learning theory perspective [J].
Thurlings, Marieke ;
Vermeulen, Marjan ;
Bastiaens, Theo ;
Stijnen, Sjef .
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REVIEW, 2013, 9 :1-15
[76]   Using video technology to enable student voice in assessment feedback [J].
Van der Kleij, Fabienne ;
Adie, Lenore ;
Cumming, Joy .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 48 (05) :1092-1105
[77]   Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends - Where, pray tell, did they get this idea? [J].
Vandenberg, RJ .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2006, 9 (02) :194-201
[78]  
Weaver MR., 2006, Assessment Evaluation in Higher Education, V31, P379, DOI [DOI 10.1080/02602930500353061, 10.1080/02602930500353061]
[79]  
Weiner B., 1984, Research on motivation in education: Student motivation, V1, P15
[80]  
West J., 2016, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, V53, P400, DOI DOI 10.1080/14703297.2014.1003954