Quality assessment framework for open government data Meta-synthesis of qualitative research, 2009-2019

被引:13
作者
Zhang, Hui [1 ]
Xiao, Jianying [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Min & Technol, Sch Publ Policy & Management, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
Quality assessment; Open government data; Meta-synthesis; Quality of open government data; OPEN DATA PORTALS; METASYNTHESIS; ETHNOGRAPHY; CHALLENGES; BENEFITS; SECTOR; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1108/EL-06-2019-0145
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Purpose To gain an in-depth understanding and provide direction to governments on their quality measurement practices related to open government data (OGD), this paper aims to develop a common frame of reference for quality assessment of OGD. Design/methodology/approach Qualitative meta-synthesis was used to synthesize previous studies on the quality measurement of OGD. This paper applies a meta-synthesis approach to integrate 10 qualitative studies into a common frame of reference for quality assessment of OGD. Findings Based on a seven-step meta-synthesis, the paper proposes a common frame of reference for quality assessment of OGD, which includes six indicators, namely, accuracy, accessibility, completeness, timeliness, consistency and understandability. Originality/value A common frame of reference for quality assessment of OGD will help researchers better understand the quality assessment of OGD and government agencies to improve the quality of OGD that they publish.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 222
页数:14
相关论文
共 92 条
[1]   Qualitative interpretive meta-synthesis in social work research: Uncharted territory [J].
Aguirre, Regina T. P. ;
Bolton, Kristin Whitehill .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2014, 14 (03) :279-294
[2]   Guest Editorial: A qualitative quandary: alternative representations and meta-synthesis [J].
Annells, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2005, 14 (05) :535-536
[3]  
[Anonymous], 9 INT C QUAL SOFTW Q
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, PHILOS INFORM QUALIT
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2013, G8 Open Data Charter
[6]   Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: Lessons learnt [J].
Atkins, Salla ;
Lewin, Simon ;
Smith, Helen ;
Engel, Mark ;
Fretheim, Atle ;
Volmink, Jimmy .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2008, 8 (1)
[7]   A systematic review of open government data initiatives [J].
Attard, Judie ;
Orlandi, Fabrizio ;
Scerri, Simon ;
Auer, Soeren .
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2015, 32 (04) :399-418
[8]  
Bair C., 2004, Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, P481, DOI [DOI 10.1007/1-4020-2456-8_11, DOI 10.1007/1-4020-2456-811, 10.1007/1-4020-2456-8_11]
[9]   Methodologies for Data Quality Assessment and Improvement [J].
Batini, Carlo ;
Cappiello, Cinzia ;
Francalanci, Chiara ;
Maurino, Andrea .
ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS, 2009, 41 (03)
[10]   A Metrics-Driven Approach for Quality Assessment of Linked Open Data [J].
Behkamal, Behshid ;
Kahani, Mohsen ;
Bagheri, Ebrahim ;
Jeremic, Zoran .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL AND APPLIED ELECTRONIC COMMERCE RESEARCH, 2014, 9 (02) :64-79