Patient-Reported Outcomes following Genetic Testing for Familial Hypercholesterolemia, Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome, and Lynch Syndrome: A Systematic Review

被引:2
作者
Hendricks-Sturrup, Rachele M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Joseph, Lucson [4 ]
Lu, Christine Y. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Pilgrim Hlth Care Inst, Dept Populat Med, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Duke Margolis Ctr Hlth Policy, Washington, DC 20004 USA
[4] Tanner Hlth Syst, Carrollton, GA 30117 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE | 2021年 / 11卷 / 09期
关键词
patient-reported outcomes; genetic testing; familial hypercholesterolemia; breast and ovarian cancer syndrome; Lynch syndrome; genomics; germline testing; PERSONAL UTILITY; RISK; BRCA1; IMPLEMENTATION; RESPONSES; WOMEN; MODEL;
D O I
10.3390/jpm11090850
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and PRO measures (PROMs) are real-world evidence that can help capture patient experiences and perspectives regarding a clinical intervention such as genetic testing. Objective: To identify and capture methods and qualitative PRO themes among studies reporting PROs following genetic testing for FH, breast and ovarian cancer syndrome, and Lynch syndrome. Methods: A systematic review was conducted via PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Yale University's TRIP Medical Databases on articles published by April 2021. Results: We identified 24 studies published between 1996 and 2021 representing 4279 participants that reported PROs following genetic testing for FH, breast and ovarian cancer syndrome, and Lynch syndrome. Studies collected and reported PROs from validated PROM instruments (n = 12; 50%), validated surveys (n = 7; 26%), and interviews (n = 10; 42%). PRO themes ranged across all collection methods (e.g., psychological, knowledge, coping and satisfaction, concern about stigma/discrimination, etc.). Conclusions: Important gaps identified include (1) most studies (n = 18; 75%) reported PROs following genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer, and (2) populations reporting PROs overall were largely of White/Caucasian/Northern European/Anglo-Saxon descent. We offer recommendations and describe real-world implications for the field moving forward.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] Quality of Life of Patients With Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Baffert, Kim-Arthur
    Darbas, Tiffany
    Lebrun-Ly, Valerie
    Pestre-Munier, Julia
    Peyramaure, Clementine
    Descours, Clementine
    Mondoly, Melanie
    Latrouite, Simon
    Bignon, Elisa
    Nicouleau, Samantha
    Geyl, Sophie
    Leobon, Sophie
    Deluche, Elise
    [J]. IN VIVO, 2021, 35 (01): : 663 - 670
  • [2] Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Patient-Reported Outcomes of Breast Cancer Patients and Survivors
    Bargon, Claudia A.
    Batenburg, Marilot C. T.
    van Stam, Lilianne E.
    van der Molen, Dieuwke R. Mink
    van Dam, Iris E.
    van der Leij, Femke
    Baas, Inge O.
    Ernst, Miranda F.
    Maarse, Wiesje
    Vermulst, Nieke
    Schoenmaeckers, Ernst J. P.
    van Dalen, Thijs
    Bijlsma, Rhode M.
    Young-Afat, Danny A.
    Doeksen, Annemiek
    Verkooijen, Helena M.
    [J]. JNCI CANCER SPECTRUM, 2021, 5 (01)
  • [3] Basch Ethan, 2018, Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book, V38, P122, DOI 10.1200/EDBK_200383
  • [4] Preferences for in-person disclosure: Patients declining telephone disclosure characteristics and outcomes in the multicenter Communication Of GENetic Test Results by Telephone study
    Beri, Nina
    Patrick-Miller, Linda J.
    Egleston, Brian L.
    Hall, Michael J.
    Domchek, Susan M.
    Daly, Mary B.
    Ganschow, Pamela
    Grana, Generosa
    Olopade, Olufunmilayo I.
    Fetzer, Dominique
    Brandt, Amanda
    Chambers, Rachelle
    Clark, Dana F.
    Forman, Andrea
    Gaber, Rikki
    Gulden, Cassandra
    Horte, Janice
    Long, Jessica
    Lucas, Terra
    Madaan, Shreshtha
    Mattie, Kristin
    McKenna, Danielle
    Montgomery, Susan
    Nielsen, Sarah
    Powers, Jacquelyn
    Rainey, Kim
    Rybak, Christina
    Savage, Michelle
    Seelaus, Christina
    Stoll, Jessica
    Stopfer, Jill E.
    Yao, Xinxin
    Bradbury, Angela R.
    [J]. CLINICAL GENETICS, 2019, 95 (02) : 293 - 301
  • [5] Longitudinal outcomes with cancer multigene panel testing in previously tested BRCA1/2 negative patients
    Bradbury, Angela R.
    Egleston, Brian L.
    Patrick-Miller, Linda J.
    Rustgi, Neil
    Brandt, Amanda
    Brower, Jamie
    DiGiovanni, Laura
    Fetzer, Dominique
    Berkelbach, Christopher
    Long, Jessica M.
    Powers, Jacquelyn
    Stopfer, Jill E.
    Domchek, Susan M.
    [J]. CLINICAL GENETICS, 2020, 97 (04) : 601 - 609
  • [6] Patient feedback and early outcome data with a novel tiered-binned model for multiplex breast cancer susceptibility testing
    Bradbury, Angela R.
    Patrick-Miller, Linda J.
    Egleston, Brian L.
    DiGiovanni, Laura
    Brower, Jamie
    Harris, Diana
    Stevens, Evelyn M.
    Maxwell, Kara N.
    Kulkarni, Abha
    Chavez, Tyler
    Brandt, Amanda
    Long, Jessica M.
    Powers, Jacquelyn
    Stopfer, Jill E.
    Nathanson, Katherine L.
    Domchek, Susan M.
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2016, 18 (01) : 25 - 33
  • [7] Psychological consequences of predictive genetic testing: a systematic review
    Broadstock, M
    Michie, S
    Marteau, T
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2000, 8 (10) : 731 - 738
  • [8] Personal utility in genomic testing: is there such a thing?
    Bunnik, Eline M.
    Janssens, A. Cecile J. W.
    Schermer, Maartje H. N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2015, 41 (04) : 322 - 326
  • [9] Cella D, 2015, TYPES PATIENT REPORT
  • [10] Psychological responses to BRCA1 mutation testing: Preliminary findings
    Croyle, RT
    Smith, KR
    Botkin, JR
    Baty, B
    Nash, J
    [J]. HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 16 (01) : 63 - 72