An enhanced role understanding of geothermal energy on compressed air energy storage in aquifers considering the underground processes

被引:14
|
作者
Li, Yi [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Ruikang [1 ]
Li, Yi [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Bin [3 ,4 ]
Dong, Jiawei [1 ]
机构
[1] Hubei Univ Technol, Sch Civil Engn Architecture & Environm, Wuhan 430068, Peoples R China
[2] Changsha Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Hydraul Engn, Changsha 410114, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Key Lab Drinking Water Sci & Technol, Res Ctr Ecoenvironm Sci, Beijing 100085, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
来源
JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE | 2021年 / 44卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Compressed air energy storage in aquifers; Geothermal energy; Underground processes; Numerical simulation;
D O I
10.1016/j.est.2021.103483
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Compressed air energy storage in aquifers (CAESA) can be a widespread low-cost application in large-scale energy storage technology that balances the power system generated by wind and solar energy. In the underground part of CAESA, a favorable deep saline aquifer with suitable permeability and porosity is utilized as the compressed air storage space, and the wellbore acts as a channel for cyclic injection and production. However, the geothermal energy corresponding to geothermal temperature distribution is commonly non-negligible in deep underground engineering. Aiming at enhancing the role understanding of geothermal energy on CAESA, the wellbore-aquifer coupled models for the entire underground processes substantiated with evidence of different geothermal gradients are developed and simulated. The air trends accumulate upwards on the top of the aquifer and move further away from the wellbore under higher geothermal temperature conditions due to the air expanding and a lighter density. And the better cushion effect and pressure support result in the small pressure fluctuation upon the air injection and production in the daily cycle. Comparative roles of geothermal energy on pressure and air distribution, the rising air production temperature heating by a high-temperature aquifer is more pronounced. In addition, the energy performance results show that the geothermal energy supplement is remarkable, even result in energy recovery from wellhead larger than the injection energy. With different geothermal temperature distributions, the energy efficiency difference in underground processes can reach 15%. The results enhance the understanding of underground processes impacted by geothermal temperature distribution. It can also help to correct the geothermal energy resources position in the site selection and provide a coupling system.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Geotechnical Feasibility Analysis of Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) in Bedded Salt Formations: a Case Study in Huai’an City, China
    Guimin Zhang
    Yinping Li
    Jaak J. K. Daemen
    Chunhe Yang
    Yu Wu
    Kai Zhang
    Yanlong Chen
    Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2015, 48 : 2111 - 2127
  • [42] Geotechnical Feasibility Analysis of Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) in Bedded Salt Formations: a Case Study in Huai'an City, China
    Zhang, Guimin
    Li, Yinping
    Daemen, Jaak J. K.
    Yang, Chunhe
    Wu, Yu
    Zhang, Kai
    Chen, Yanlong
    ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2015, 48 (05) : 2111 - 2127
  • [43] Thermo-economic and environmental comparison of renewable feed compressed air energy storage systems for stable green hydrogen production
    Zoghi, Mohammad
    Gharaie, Saleh
    Hosseinzadeh, Nasser
    Zare, Ali
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2025, 110
  • [44] Strategic use of the underground in an energy mix plan: Synergies among CO2, CH4 geological storage and geothermal energy. Latium Region case study (Central Italy)
    Procesi, M.
    Cantucci, B.
    Buttinelli, M.
    Armezzani, G.
    Quattrocchi, F.
    Boschi, E.
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2013, 110 : 104 - 131
  • [45] Well placement optimization for large-scale geothermal energy exploitation considering nature hydro-thermal processes in the Gonghe Basin, China
    Zhang, Siyu
    Jiang, Zhenjiao
    Zhang, Shengsheng
    Zhang, Qixing
    Feng, Guanhong
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 317
  • [46] A comprehensive study of a green hybrid multi-generation compressed air energy storage (CAES) system for sustainable cities: Energy, exergy, economic, exergoeconomic, and advanced exergy analysis
    Bushehri, Mehdi Chahabi
    Zolfaghari, Seyed Mohammad
    Soltani, M.
    Nabat, Mohammad Hossein
    Nathwani, Jatin
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2024, 101
  • [47] Study on the characteristics of charging/discharging processes in three-phase energy storage coupling in solar air conditioning system
    Bi, Yuehong
    Zang, Gaoli
    Qin, Lifeng
    Li, Hongyan
    Wang, Hongyan
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2019, 204
  • [48] Analysis of Tangential Leakage Flow Characteristics of Oil-Free Scroll Expander for a Micro-Scale Compressed Air Energy Storage System
    Sun, Jian
    Peng, Bin
    Zhu, Bingguo
    Li, Yaohong
    ENTROPY, 2023, 25 (02)
  • [49] Stability of a lined rock cavern for compressed air energy storage containing a weak interlayer during blasting in the adjacent cavern: model tests and numerical simulation
    Zhang, Mengchen
    Luo, Yi
    Gong, Hangli
    Liu, Xin
    Deng, Yunchen
    GEOMECHANICS AND GEOPHYSICS FOR GEO-ENERGY AND GEO-RESOURCES, 2023, 9 (01)
  • [50] Comprehensive safety assessment of two-well-horizontal caverns with sediment space for compressed air energy storage in low-grade salt rocks
    Li, Qihang
    Liu, Wei
    Jiang, Liangliang
    Qin, Jianxu
    Wang, Yifan
    Wan, Jifang
    Zhu, Xuanshi
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2024, 102