An enhanced role understanding of geothermal energy on compressed air energy storage in aquifers considering the underground processes

被引:14
|
作者
Li, Yi [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Ruikang [1 ]
Li, Yi [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Bin [3 ,4 ]
Dong, Jiawei [1 ]
机构
[1] Hubei Univ Technol, Sch Civil Engn Architecture & Environm, Wuhan 430068, Peoples R China
[2] Changsha Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Hydraul Engn, Changsha 410114, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Key Lab Drinking Water Sci & Technol, Res Ctr Ecoenvironm Sci, Beijing 100085, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
来源
JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE | 2021年 / 44卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Compressed air energy storage in aquifers; Geothermal energy; Underground processes; Numerical simulation;
D O I
10.1016/j.est.2021.103483
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Compressed air energy storage in aquifers (CAESA) can be a widespread low-cost application in large-scale energy storage technology that balances the power system generated by wind and solar energy. In the underground part of CAESA, a favorable deep saline aquifer with suitable permeability and porosity is utilized as the compressed air storage space, and the wellbore acts as a channel for cyclic injection and production. However, the geothermal energy corresponding to geothermal temperature distribution is commonly non-negligible in deep underground engineering. Aiming at enhancing the role understanding of geothermal energy on CAESA, the wellbore-aquifer coupled models for the entire underground processes substantiated with evidence of different geothermal gradients are developed and simulated. The air trends accumulate upwards on the top of the aquifer and move further away from the wellbore under higher geothermal temperature conditions due to the air expanding and a lighter density. And the better cushion effect and pressure support result in the small pressure fluctuation upon the air injection and production in the daily cycle. Comparative roles of geothermal energy on pressure and air distribution, the rising air production temperature heating by a high-temperature aquifer is more pronounced. In addition, the energy performance results show that the geothermal energy supplement is remarkable, even result in energy recovery from wellhead larger than the injection energy. With different geothermal temperature distributions, the energy efficiency difference in underground processes can reach 15%. The results enhance the understanding of underground processes impacted by geothermal temperature distribution. It can also help to correct the geothermal energy resources position in the site selection and provide a coupling system.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Induced geochemical reactions by compressed air energy storage in a porous formation in the North German Basin
    Wang, Bo
    Bauer, Sebastian
    APPLIED GEOCHEMISTRY, 2019, 102 : 171 - 185
  • [32] Investigation of the unsteady flow in a transonic axial compressor adopted in the compressed air energy storage system
    An, Guangyao
    Kang, Jiacheng
    Zou, Yihui
    Zhang, Lei
    Lang, Jinhua
    Yuan, Wei
    Zhang, Qian
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2023, 63
  • [33] A comprehensive energy, exergy, economic, and environmental (4E) assessment of a geothermal-driven polygeneration plant with energy storage using compressed hydrogen
    Yilmaz, Fatih
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2025, 114
  • [34] Multi-objective optimization of an underwater compressed air energy storage system using genetic algorithm
    Cheung, Brian C.
    Carriveau, Rupp
    Ting, David S. K.
    ENERGY, 2014, 74 : 396 - 404
  • [35] The performance analysis of a compressed air energy storage (CAES) for peak moving with cooling, heating, and power production
    Assareh, Ehsanolah
    Hoseinzadeh, Siamak
    Karami, Abolfazl
    Bazazzadeh, Hassan
    Groppi, Daniele
    Garcia, Davide Astiaso
    CASE STUDIES IN THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 64
  • [36] Study on the Potential and Pre-feasibility of Compressed Air Energy Storage of Abandoned Coal Mines in China
    Du J.
    Chen J.
    Jiang D.
    Fan J.
    Zhang C.
    Chen Z.
    Gongcheng Kexue Yu Jishu/Advanced Engineering Sciences, 2023, 55 (01): : 253 - 264
  • [37] A coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical model for evaluating air leakage from an unlined compressed air energy storage cavern
    Wu, Di
    Wang, J. G.
    Hu, Bowen
    Yang, Sheng-Qi
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 146 (146) : 907 - 920
  • [38] 2D design and characteristic analysis of an underwater airbag with mooring for underwater compressed air energy storage
    Sun, Ke
    Liu, Mingyao
    Lu, Changbo
    You, Yun
    Zhang, Jianhua
    Meng, Wei
    Kang, Jichuan
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2023, 285
  • [39] Thermodynamic analysis of lined rock caverns for initial inflation and cyclic operational conditions in compressed air energy storage
    Geng, Xuan
    Sun, Guanhua
    Wu, Ke
    Yao, Yuanfeng
    Ji, Wendong
    Yu, Xianyang
    Wang, Jiao
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2024, 99
  • [40] Process arrangement and multi-criteria study/optimization of a novel hybrid solar-geothermal scheme combined with a compressed air energy storage: Application of different MOPSO-based scenarios
    Yin, Pei
    Sardari, Farshid
    ENERGY, 2023, 282