Does Implant Density Impact Three-Dimensional Deformity Correction in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis with Lenke 1 and 2 Curves Treated by Posterior Spinal Fusion without Ponte osteotomies?

被引:9
作者
Lertudomphonwanit, Thamrong [1 ]
Berry, Chirag A. [2 ]
Jain, Viral V. [3 ]
Sturm, Peter F. [3 ]
机构
[1] Mahidol Univ, Ramathibodi Hosp, Fac Med, Dept Orthopaed, Bangkok, Thailand
[2] Cincinnati VA Med Ctr, Cincinnati, OH USA
[3] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr, Div Orthopaed Surg, 3333 Burnet Ave,MLC 2017, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA
关键词
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Pedicle screws; Implant density; Curve correction; PEDICLE SCREW FIXATION; INSTRUMENTATION; HYBRID; HOOK; CONSTRUCTS; ROTATION; KYPHOSIS;
D O I
10.31616/asj.2020.0398
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Purpose: To determine whether implant density impact three-dimensional deformity correction in posterior spinal fusion (PSF) without Ponte osteotomies (POs) for patients with Lenke 1 and 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Overview of literature: Currently, the optimal pedicle screw (PS) density for flexible moderate-sized thoracic AIS curve correction is still controversial. There are limited data regarding the impact of implant density on three-dimensional correction in PSF without the use of PO for thoracic AIS surgery. Methods: A database of patients with AIS with Lenke 1 and 2 curves treated with PSF without PO and instrumented with PSs and >= 2-year follow-up was reviewed. The preoperative, immediate, and final follow-up postoperative radiographs were analyzed. The correlation between PS density and the following factors were determined: major curve correction (MCC), correction index (CI; MCC/ curve flexibility), kyphosis angle change, and rib index (RI) correction. Then, patients were divided into low-density (LD) and high-density (HD) groups according to mean PS density for the entire cohort (1.5 PS per level). Demographics and radiographic and clinical outcomes were compared between groups. Results: The study included 99 patients with Lenke 1 and 23 patients with Lenke 2 AIS. The average MCC was 67.2%. There was no correlation between screw density and these parameters: MCC (r=0.10,p=0.26), CI (r=0.16,p=0.07), change in T2-T12 kyphosis angle (r=-0.13, p=0.14), and RI correction (r=-0.09, p=0.37). Demographic and preoperative radiographic parameters were similar between the LD and HD groups. At the latest follow-up, there were no differences between the two groups in regard to MCC, CI, change in T2-T12 kyphosis angle, RI correction, and Scoliosis Research Society-30 scores (all p>0.05). Conclusions: This study revealed no significant correlation between screw density and curve correction in any planes. HD construct may not provide better deformity correction in patients with flexible and moderate thoracic AIS undergoing PSF without PO.
引用
收藏
页码:375 / 385
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Computed Tomography Evaluation of Rotation Correction in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis A Comparison of an All Pedicle Screw Construct Versus a Hook-Rod System
    Asghar, Jahangir
    Samdani, Amer F.
    Pahys, Joshua M.
    D'Andrea, Linda P.
    Guille, James T.
    Clements, David H.
    Betz, Randal R.
    [J]. SPINE, 2009, 34 (08) : 804 - 807
  • [2] Low-density versus high-density thoracic pedicle screw constructs in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: do more screws lead to a better outcome?
    Bharucha, Neil J.
    Lonner, Baron S.
    Auerbach, Joshua D.
    Kean, Kristin E.
    Trobisch, Per D.
    [J]. SPINE JOURNAL, 2013, 13 (04) : 375 - 381
  • [3] Correction of Lenke 5 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Using Pedicle Screw Instrumentation Does Implant Density Influence the Correction?
    Chen, Jiayu
    Yang, Changwei
    Ran, Bo
    Wang, Yunhua
    Wang, Chao
    Zhu, Xiaodong
    Bai, Yushu
    Li, Ming
    [J]. SPINE, 2013, 38 (15) : E946 - E951
  • [4] Apical sublaminar wires versus pedicle screws - Which provides better results for surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?
    Cheng, I
    Kim, Y
    Gupta, MC
    Bridwell, KH
    Hurford, RK
    Lee, SS
    Theerajunyaporn, T
    Lenke, LG
    [J]. SPINE, 2005, 30 (18) : 2104 - 2112
  • [5] Predictability of the Fulcrum Bending Radiograph in Scoliosis Correction with Alternate-Level Pedicle Screw Fixation
    Cheung, Kenneth M. C.
    Natarajan, Deepa
    Samartzis, Dino
    Wong, Yat-Wa
    Cheung, Wai-Yuen
    Luk, Keith D. K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2010, 92A (01) : 169 - 176
  • [6] Correlation of Scoliosis Curve Correction With the Number and Type of Fixation Anchors
    Clements, David H.
    Betz, Randal R.
    Newton, Peter O.
    Rohmiller, Michael
    Marks, Michelle C.
    Bastrom, Tracey
    [J]. SPINE, 2009, 34 (20) : 2147 - 2150
  • [7] Implant Density at the Apex Is More Important Than Overall Implant Density for 3D Correction in Thoracic Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Using Rod Derotation and En Bloc Vertebral Derotation Technique
    Delikaris, Alexandre
    Wang, Xiaoyu
    Boyer, Laure
    Larson, A. Noelle
    Ledonio, Charles G. T.
    Aubin, Carl-Eric
    [J]. SPINE, 2018, 43 (11) : E639 - E647
  • [8] Posterior fusion only for thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis of more than 80°:: pedicle screws versus hybrid instrumentation
    Di Silvestre, Mario
    Bakaloudis, Georgios
    Lolli, Francesco
    Vommaro, Francesco
    Martikos, Konstantinos
    Parisini, Patrizio
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2008, 17 (10) : 1336 - 1349
  • [9] Anterior/posterior spinal instrumentation versus posterior instrumentation alone for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliotic curves more than 90°
    Dobbs, Matthew B.
    Lenke, Lawrence G.
    Kim, Yongjung J.
    Luhmann, Scott J.
    Bridwell, Keith H.
    [J]. SPINE, 2006, 31 (20) : 2386 - 2391
  • [10] Grivas TB, 2002, ST HEAL T, V88, P38