Who Are You Asking?: Qualitative Methods for Involving AAC Users as Primary Research Participants

被引:14
作者
Beneteau, Erin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS (CHI'20) | 2020年
关键词
AAC; Augmentative and Alternative Communication; Qualitative Research; Methods; HCI; Disabilities; DEVELOPMENTAL-DISABILITIES; ALTERNATIVE COMMUNICATION; CEREBRAL-PALSY; ADULTS; EXPERIENCES; INDIVIDUALS; PEOPLE; LIFE; TECHNOLOGIES; PERSPECTIVES;
D O I
10.1145/3313831.3376883
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
When trying to understand people's perspectives, qualitative researchers in HCI often use methods which assume participants can easily communicate verbally. There are few dedicated resources in HCI which provide an overview of qualitative methods to effectively gather the perspectives of people who cannot easily communicate verbally; specifically, people who use Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC). As a result, AAC users might be excluded from studies using methods such as interviews or focus groups, even if they fit the researcher's target population. To address this problem, I review literature from both HCI and therapeutic AAC research fields to discuss methods used with AAC users. In addition, I present relevant case examples from my own qualitative research and propose a framework to guide HCI researchers on choosing appropriate methods when involving AAC users as central research participants. I also identify design opportunities for HCI researchers to innovate on the tools and methods used for qualitative research with AAC users. This paper provides an easily accessible overview of qualitative methods HCI researchers can use with AAC users as participants.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Allen M, 2007, ASSETS'07: PROCEEDINGS OF THE NINTH INTERNATIONAL ACM SIGACCESS CONFERENCE ON COMPUTERS AND ACCESSIBILITY, P187
[2]  
Bache J, 2008, NEUROREHABILITATION, V23, P343
[3]   Member Checking: A Tool to Enhance Trustworthiness or Merely a Nod to Validation? [J].
Birt, Linda ;
Scott, Suzanne ;
Cavers, Debbie ;
Campbell, Christine ;
Walter, Fiona .
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2016, 26 (13) :1802-1811
[4]   Supporting Personal Narrative for Children with Complex Communication Needs [J].
Black, Rolf ;
Waller, Annalu ;
Turner, Ross ;
Reiter, Ehud .
ACM TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTER-HUMAN INTERACTION, 2012, 19 (02)
[5]  
Black R, 2011, ASSETS 11: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH INTERNATIONAL ACM SIGACCESS CONFERENCE ON COMPUTERS AND ACCESSIBILITY, P171
[6]   Key principles underlying research and practice in AAC [J].
Blackstone, Sarah W. ;
Williams, Michael B. ;
Wilkins, David P. .
AUGMENTATIVE AND ALTERNATIVE COMMUNICATION, 2007, 23 (03) :191-203
[7]  
Brewster S.J., 2004, BRIT J LEARN DISABIL, V32, P166, DOI DOI 10.1111/bld.2004.32.issue-4
[8]   "Social Media has Opened a World of 'Open communication:'" experiences of Adults with Cerebral Palsy who use Augmentative and Alternative Communication and Social Media [J].
Caron, Jessica ;
Light, Janice .
AUGMENTATIVE AND ALTERNATIVE COMMUNICATION, 2016, 32 (01) :25-40
[9]   Views of young people using augmentative and alternative communication systems [J].
Clarke, M ;
McConachie, H ;
Price, K ;
Wood, P .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 2001, 36 (01) :107-115
[10]   Interaction between children with cerebral palsy and their peers 1: Organizing and understanding VOCA use [J].
Clarke, Michael ;
Wilkinson, Ray .
AUGMENTATIVE AND ALTERNATIVE COMMUNICATION, 2007, 23 (04) :336-348